The Surgeon General's office pushed to remove true side-effect reports. The President said the platforms carrying them were "killing people." I was one of the twelve they came for.
If the right people look into the way back, before vaccines were mandated, the government mandated the CDC do the research to prove that vax's are safe and efficacious. They never produced the research because they never did it. Our DOJ sued them for it but let the jabs keep on coming.
An insidious form of censorship has occurred , spanning many decades, in which an enormous body of scientific evidence on harm from a form of pollution was suppressed, apparently over national security concerns. In the early 1960s, Alan Frey complained that the information he and others had uncovered was not reaching the public. As the severity of the pollution increased, more and more people found out about it on their own, but when they tried to approach the public, they were mischaracterized as right-wing and prevented from reaching the public with their warnings. The only way they could progress was talking person to person to inevitably skeptical audiences. When the Net came, they were allowed into the little echo chambers the Net is so famous for, but not beyond. Moreover, many of the victims could not use the Net to any real degree, since they had become sensitized to the medium--non-ionizing radiation.
The award is for, driving transformative change, so technically not incompatible with what he did. It was transformative, but in a bad, dishonest, and inhumane way
I'd like to send this information to sceptics who I don't think will be impressed by the links I've seen here which are (as far as I can tell) links to other social media platforms. What I'd rather see is links to the congressional record. does that exist?
So what was the net effect of vaccination? Did more people die because the vaccination was administered than if no one were vaccinated? Who were the people who should not have been vaccinated and how would the have known not to take it. What does “countless” mean? If there is no quantification then it’s difficult to appreciate what the overall impact was. Totally respect that there should have been some qualification about how safe the vaccine is, but majority of recipients seem to have come through, no? In any emergency situation like that there may be difficult choices, maybe not even detectable when choices have to be made. What if the vaccine had bad, even fatal side effects for one in a million people and we couldn’t tell who would be negatively impacted? One in 10 million? At what point would the well-being of the whole outweigh the right to individual choice? Never? What if we were talking about Ebola? Would we still be squabbling about individual rights if we know there is a significant portion of the population that would act irrationally out of simple mistrust/defiance?
You're giving the benefit of the doubt to a psyop that killed 21 million people. We have the receipts in sudden deaths alone to dispel doubt. I think Sayer Ji is doing his best to tell the story of what really happened, i.e. an all out assault on humanity with a syringe of poison given in multiple doses to unsuspecting people, many of whom would still be here today had they not been injected. On top of that, health policies known to be ineffective by the people espousing them were forced upon vulnerable people. The best interests of people and their health was not a priority for those making the decisions. That's why government healthcare is such a bad idea. The government would rather not have to fund your healthcare, and you know what that means.
I wonder why they were so vigilant regarding vaccine hesitancy. Was it bad press they were worried about, or was it simply bad faith? What was so imperative about getting everybody jabbed? Was it the hinge to ending the lockdowns? Was it the longterm success of the platform that was top of mind? Were they just ravenous, and the jab was tied into that? Was the whole financial apparatus they built around the jab propelling it forward? No part of their program could be questioned. It had to go forward. Was it simply the love of money wedded with an anti-human ideology and a dash of political correctness (wokeness) that underpinned the Deep State's assault on the deplorables?
If the right people look into the way back, before vaccines were mandated, the government mandated the CDC do the research to prove that vax's are safe and efficacious. They never produced the research because they never did it. Our DOJ sued them for it but let the jabs keep on coming.
An insidious form of censorship has occurred , spanning many decades, in which an enormous body of scientific evidence on harm from a form of pollution was suppressed, apparently over national security concerns. In the early 1960s, Alan Frey complained that the information he and others had uncovered was not reaching the public. As the severity of the pollution increased, more and more people found out about it on their own, but when they tried to approach the public, they were mischaracterized as right-wing and prevented from reaching the public with their warnings. The only way they could progress was talking person to person to inevitably skeptical audiences. When the Net came, they were allowed into the little echo chambers the Net is so famous for, but not beyond. Moreover, many of the victims could not use the Net to any real degree, since they had become sensitized to the medium--non-ionizing radiation.
The award is for, driving transformative change, so technically not incompatible with what he did. It was transformative, but in a bad, dishonest, and inhumane way
I'd like to send this information to sceptics who I don't think will be impressed by the links I've seen here which are (as far as I can tell) links to other social media platforms. What I'd rather see is links to the congressional record. does that exist?
So what was the net effect of vaccination? Did more people die because the vaccination was administered than if no one were vaccinated? Who were the people who should not have been vaccinated and how would the have known not to take it. What does “countless” mean? If there is no quantification then it’s difficult to appreciate what the overall impact was. Totally respect that there should have been some qualification about how safe the vaccine is, but majority of recipients seem to have come through, no? In any emergency situation like that there may be difficult choices, maybe not even detectable when choices have to be made. What if the vaccine had bad, even fatal side effects for one in a million people and we couldn’t tell who would be negatively impacted? One in 10 million? At what point would the well-being of the whole outweigh the right to individual choice? Never? What if we were talking about Ebola? Would we still be squabbling about individual rights if we know there is a significant portion of the population that would act irrationally out of simple mistrust/defiance?
You're giving the benefit of the doubt to a psyop that killed 21 million people. We have the receipts in sudden deaths alone to dispel doubt. I think Sayer Ji is doing his best to tell the story of what really happened, i.e. an all out assault on humanity with a syringe of poison given in multiple doses to unsuspecting people, many of whom would still be here today had they not been injected. On top of that, health policies known to be ineffective by the people espousing them were forced upon vulnerable people. The best interests of people and their health was not a priority for those making the decisions. That's why government healthcare is such a bad idea. The government would rather not have to fund your healthcare, and you know what that means.
You’re swimming upstream - not saying you’re wrong, just a high bar to clear…
did 21 million people die from covid vaccine
No, the claim that 21 million people died from COVID-19 vaccines is false. Extensive studies and data show that vaccines have saved millions of lives and that reported deaths are not causally linked to vaccination. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/11/08/covid-19-vaccines-have-saved-not-killed-millions-fact-check/71499233007/
Understanding Vaccine Safety and Death Claims
Claims of high death rates linked to COVID-19 vaccines are unfounded.
Reported Deaths — Claims of 21 million deaths are based on misinterpretations and flawed data.
Vaccine Efficacy — COVID-19 vaccines
"None of the leaders of this effort to police COVID speech had health expertise."
Neither did the health "experts."
I wonder why they were so vigilant regarding vaccine hesitancy. Was it bad press they were worried about, or was it simply bad faith? What was so imperative about getting everybody jabbed? Was it the hinge to ending the lockdowns? Was it the longterm success of the platform that was top of mind? Were they just ravenous, and the jab was tied into that? Was the whole financial apparatus they built around the jab propelling it forward? No part of their program could be questioned. It had to go forward. Was it simply the love of money wedded with an anti-human ideology and a dash of political correctness (wokeness) that underpinned the Deep State's assault on the deplorables?
The petition link doesn’t work…. Change.org is “dead”?