I am having a problem finding grapes that don't have Gates "apeal" on them .the last two batches of grapes i bought , where uneditable , they were hard , and the second batch has lasted 3 weeks , so suspect . neither were marked with the apeal lable . I have been buying grapses from Sam's for years every week , I buy red table grapes . they have always been good until the last 3 weeks .
See my comment below. Brandt’s book may have been the one I was referring to. I don’t know how easy the protocol was, because the person in the book that I read ate an enormous amount of grapes.
Spectacular article! As a cancer researcher who walked away from that outrageous and oppressive "medical" business model years ago, I am so grateful that you continue to bring such essential information to our attention. Not all may be ready to drink from the well of natural health. Nature doesn't offer "quick fix" pills or health-draining regimens that so many still believe constitute "cures." Instead Nature gently offers true healing and rejuvenation. Our deep programming to obey conventional medical demands continues to overpower our innate wisdom to trust Nature and reject the ravages of medical warfare visited upon us. I thank you for your direct and unflinching approach to educating (and freeing) us all. Namaste
Last year my GP wanted to test my blood but did not say why. When he gave me the results about a fortnight later, he said, “You don’t have cancer!” As if I might have been concerned about that. I was baffled into silence.
Why did he think that was a possibility? Could it be that most of his elderly clients DO have cancer? I didn’t ask because I have always surprised this doctor by refusing all pharmaceuticals and apparently, I am the only person over 60 on his list who is not swallowing handfuls of pills every few hours!
He is about as much use to me as a chocolate fire guard and a lot less nutritious.
But yes—medical providers (& almost everyone else) DO sucker for stereotyping!
I’m mid-70s. When I have something go haywire that I cannot figure out, I MIGHT show up in urgent care or ER. Each of the few times I have, the staff immediately stereotype a fat, old, debilitated female—who “obviously” has high BP, clogged arteries, high cholesterol, diabetes, it must be cardiovascular ills, etc…..then they start with measurements & tests…& find NONE of that (or modest cholesterol buffered by HDL..).
For which they can only flimsily try to push statins.
Or, they tried to push Paxlovid for a Covid infection (high rate of false tests, & I came in several days too late for that med—it was downright comedic!).
They end up retrenching to writing up go-home orders listing stuff I've been doing myself.
2 other times, I ended up in hospital, but all they had to offer was IV fluids—I refused to let the young surgeon cut out a big chunk of intestines with appendix (cuz of inflammation he said was visible on MRI), & went home to fix it myself (still breathing, & in better shape, 3 yrs later);
& refused surgery to remove skin cancers that flared-up at that Covid onset in 2023, & fixed those myself too, using more natural methods (did not tell them about the breast involvement—that’s been vastly improving too—I could handle dealing with their pushing surgery for things they could easily see were healing, but did not want to deal with their attitudes for breast involvement)
They dunno what to think. Their model is, put people on drugs for life. I told ‘em, I use a LOT of various supplements, BUT, as-needed, for some special need, or, if I don’t eat nutritiously enuf…so, as-needed.
I don’t take drugs if those are avoidable—pretty much most if not all, can be.
I don’t agree to their model of doing things, much of the time.
The more success at DIY naturally, the less use of commercial healthcare I need—except maybe in a dire emergency.
Natural can take longer.
Sometimes it can be pretty fast though.
It’s worth it. It’s gentler. It usually leaves no scars.
It’s far less traumatic. It’s definitely less costly.
The industry really hates that—but I love it!
And—it requires education, experience, & more, to hope to get it right. I’m an RN with much experience in natural methods, which has served me well, doing for self & family.
A friend had been piffled-off when she asked docs about a very itchy sore on her back, til it got diameter of an orange.
After they finally told her hurry up get surgery for it, She called me; I knew she routinely cared for rescue cats. In conversation, it came out one cat claw had poked skin where the lesion started.
Cat claws, especially rescues/ferals, commonly have parasites & all kinds of germs; the claw essentially seeded-in whatever organisms were residue on that claw!
Same docs who piffled it off for almost a year, said it’s the worse kind of cancer, it’ll kill you regardless, we can only buy time….
I encouraged her to find a doc who’d taken over our old docs practice.
Get ivermectin & fenbendazole.
She got the Ivermectin about 3 weeks ahead of surgery, but the fenben didn’t arrive til 2 days before.
She started each as soon as rec’d.
Each dose, she could feel the tumor shrink from its margins & flatten, then as dose wore off, it rebounded.
The scan before surgery showed a tiny metastasis in her lung, under the tumor.
Surgeon very surprised to find tumor was totally contained in membrane.
They did a very radical (down to scraping ribs) surgery.
She still reported feeling hugely better right after. Within a week, she was back doing yard work, tho, limiting how long or heavy.
The assigned radiologist not only tried to push—hard—for her to start that immediately, he & staff tried to get her labeled “mental” for refusing blood transfusion, & for refusing radiation treatment.
Here’s the key for those sorts:
tell them, “I appreciate your input, but I think it is prudent to wait til after the reconstructive surgery, & then, to wait & see.”
Some arrangement of words that conveys to pushy docs, you appreciate their advice, take it under advisement, but that you choose to wait & see, watch & wait, before jumping to conclusions.
Her plastic surgeon who did reconstructive, told her: “very good you did Not jump into radiation treatments yet, or reconstructive couldn’t work nearly as well!”
Follow-up scans: the lung metastasis was gone. No others found. Everything healing very UNexpectedly well.
The docs are baffled, cuz their prognosis was dire, as-in, put your affairs in order.
She has beaten all their odds. It’s about 2 years after, now, & by their estimates, she should at least be in hospice, if not 6’ under.
She’s happily doing heavy gardening, housework, part-time job, & elder care for both her elderly parents. She is about in her mid-60s.
She follows a paleo diet, very low carbs or starch; lots of fresh produce from her yard. She continues on reduced doses of those 2 meds, supervised by different doc.
She has not, to date, told the regular docs about taking the 2 meds.
A patient at our old office, end-stage pancreatic cancer. Chose to try experimental protocol using only USP pure reduced L-glutathione.
Note: debilitated older people’s bodies cannot make much of it, nor from eating precursors; so need the ready-to-absorb substance.
He cycled thru the protocol about 3 times in about 5 months.
His other (diagnosing) docs could not find any cancers after.
Commentary:
I’ve met one woman who struggles w/cancers, who said the 2 meds did not help her. She has struggled w/various types of cancers for several years.
But, she did not say what doses, or how long she took them.
Docs are notorious for UNDER prescribing the right Antifungals & antiparasite meds, IF they do at all, that can go systemic, long enuf; they also often fail to monitor liver & kidney function during use of them.
There are herbal versions of antifungal/antiparasites, some safer, & as effective.
Heroic doses of Reduced L-glutathione are terrific at stopping infections of all kinds. It is a fierce antioxidants, & helps healing. BUT it is acidic. In huge doses, it MIGHT add to kidney stones—tho the scientists I spoke with, said it did not.
I think they claimed it was Basel cell. But none of them had done anything about previous lesions that had looked FAR worse.
I think, based on knowledge & experience, they try to make specific labels, but, there are too many variables to really pinpoint things, way too often.
For all efforts, dietary is KEY. Low carbs, especially starches & sugars. I even needed to quit fruits for a longish time. Those all caused noticeable worsening if eaten. As organic as able. Vegan can be used longer-term than keto—keto is great to quickly reduce inflammation, then, gradually change to vegan….plenty of solid data showing well-balanced vegan can heal many end-stage cardiovascular & cancers. There’s more.
For previous lesions, which looked different:
I had fewer things I knew to do, so looked at those in context of what signs they showed. The bigger, leakier ones had features/signs of impetigo, so used an OTC antibiotic that specifically targeted that component. Next, an antifungal topical. Then, used herbal topicals. Got those (biggest about size of quarter) down to about 1/4” diameter, then used a heated dinner knife blade, flat on the remaining spots, to burn the germs left, that kept trying to return. Must be very careful not to burn too deep—only sizzled the top for a couple split seconds, enuf to blister lightly. . Then used inner-leaf gel from fresh cut aloe, twice daily.
In the last 20 years or so, a couple times, had suspicious textures & pains in one breast. Triaging signs/symptoms, It kinda reminded me of when I nursed my 1st baby, & got infections. But the textures of it were different. For all those, I’d applied heating pad, as hot as I could stand without causing a burn, to induce artificial local fever, for about 30 minutes daily for about a week…problem solved.
But by the time the stabbing knife pains woke me in 12/2023, I had gotten a medical-grade red/infrared light gadget, that delivered a range of light spectrum from about 650 to 1015 Hertz (Hz). Heat IS infrared light, even tho it is not visible to our eyes.
I used that red gadget first, & it stopped the scale-10 pain in elbo & breast, within about 10 minutes. I kept using that gadget on the problem areas, til it’s charge ran out, & repeated daily for about a week.
Most of the lesions on elbo & nose were removed by the biopsy, I think. She was a bit sloppy on the nose one, so there remained a scant bit of cells at the edges.
I kept using the Red gadget, & diet, herbals, nutrients—various as they seemed indicated.
To date: the elbo randomly signals pain, wich might be a warning; similar for breast. I use the Red gadget, & those are again reduced/gone. I don’t claim to be “healed”.
I do state: watch/observe, & IF anything seems to try to return, AND does not respond to my tactics, THEN I would seek the docs, & MIGHT allow surgery, IF things were bad enuf.
But I very much doubt ever using “chemo”, & certainly not radiation. Radiation as a “treatment”, is based on faked researches for many decades (I was staff for one of the big ones); it burns tissues, preventing surgical wounds from properly healing.
Now, there are even internet scammers trying to rewrite history of radiation sources (radium, spec.), painting it as safe, & used since the 1800s…hogwash!—kinda like flat-earthers have tried to get foljs to believe that.
There are scammers & influencers who try to promote very iffy & fake stuff. Beware of those. Just because “nature grew it”, does Not mean something is 100% safe! (Or even safe for many)
There’s plenty of big indust’s with deeply vested interests in convincing public to avoid natural stuff, pushing-back against using natural methods; containing half-truths & whole lies, incl. heavy doses of bogus marketing psych..
One must learn how their body really works; study old & new info, use common sense. Include historical context & info….some goes back thousands of years.
Thank you for this amazing article that can help even the most indigent sufferers of Rockefeller medicine. May G-d shine down on you with unlimited blessings Preserving this article now.
The first study you referenced argued that a standard amount of vitamin c that many people get daily shrinks tumors over 50%. While I'm sure many people aren't getting grapes in their diet, I would think most are getting vitamin c.
It would seem that there should be a lot less cancer than there is if vitamin c alone is so effective. Or am I missing something?
I might tend to think, that the type/source of C matters. Almost all supplements sold, are lab-made C analogue, ascorbic acid. That follows big industry model, of focusing on a purified, lab-made single ingredient the “experts” claim is just as good or better, than getting natural food sourced nutrients.
Lab made analogue supplements are often different than natural ones, because for some reason, even tho “science” knows better, industry equates the natural with lab-made—but they are not.
Most lab-made nutrient substitutes not only lack all the Co-factors that should come with the “main ingredient” in foods, to help the body use it…..But the very molecules made in labs, are turning the wrong way! Molecules’ energy must fit into the body’s receptor sites’ own energy—if lab made molecules spin backwards, they cannot plug into or do the needed job in the body as well. So, ya might think you swallowed 1 gram of ascorbic acid C, the body cannot use it nearly as well—that might look more like only eating maybe 50mg., or such.
Also….
Manufactures foods mostly start by using GMOd/glyphosated foods grown by AgriBiz. Glyphosate was first registered as an antibiotic!…then changed to being a defoliant. Which also kills off the life in the soil (& your gut biota…). The soil biota are critically important for carrying minerals from rocks & dirt, into receptors on plant roots. The industrialized farms replace only a fraction of needed nutrients using basic fertilizers—enuf to grow cosmetically “nice” produce, but not containing the full array of nutrients to sustain life in a healthy way—for the plant nor the creatures that eat it. Grains can have 2 or 3 applications of glyphosate on them—which food makers cannot, as far as I know, remove—so—people & other critters have been eating those.
There’s also “field washing” (dunking produce in a bucket of water—industry calls that “processing”)…which allows the produce to get irradiated lightly, to kill germs on it, to extend shelf-life—without labelling. …Or, it gets sprayed with bgates’ chemical coating to preserve it—but, humans aren’t s’posed to consume that quantity of that substance—& it’s a lab analogue of the real substance, to make it patentable—none know the long-term affects! THEN…food manufacturers start processing it even more, which further decreases nutritional content…. See where that is all going?
So, even when someone ..thinks.. they are eating plenty of C from foods, or supplements—it is entirely dependent on IF or How Much the food is actually organic, & how much it’s been processed, & what other additives were put into it, that might interrupt the body using any nutrients in the foods consumed.
And…Consumer/Social Engineering (industries convincing consumers to buy what they’re selling & consume it more, faster…)….has helped millions more folks “choose” to avoid eating the seeds & peels of produce or fish or chicken—where much of the concentrated nutrients are. Industries remove peels, skins, bones, seeds, & sell those downstream to other industries to make saleable products, instead of folks getting to eat those to keep us healthier. They denature foods & ingredients from those, to have longer shelflife.
Also, it depends on what & how much of the other many thousands of hormone & nutrient interrupting manmade chemicals a person is also exposed to, 24/7. Last I knew, no one gave industries permission to make them chronically ill from billions of manmade products, to suffer for years or decades before we die prematurely to serve oligarch’s depopulation agenda. No amount of forced pregnancies can bail-out big industries’ from their longer than 200 years of malfeasant corruption.
Overall, relatively few get enuf of anything like a full array of nutrients, much less daily.
& most are having chemical compounds interrupt them getting or using the nutrients they do get. Or, the exposures are overwhelming, so start disease processes when bodies lack enuf nutrients to ward those off.
& The Industry makes sure most docs are mostly ignorant of all that & more, so they don’t look or test for it. Most commercial docs fail to recognize malnutrition unless it’s so bad it can’t be missed. Most will totally miss chemical exposures in patients, or, when patients tell their docs, the docs don’t know what to do about it.
Does that help ?
Docs like Sayer & folks who learn from them, are doing better than most, by getting educated enuf to chose more wisely what they consume, & what they chose to help themselves with, using more natural methods. A big % of us learned the hard way, by going thru many rounds of malpractice foisted on us as “healthcare”, that we must be our own best advocate, cuz industries are not.
So, it’s necessary, increasingly, to get nutrients we need, using Natural-based supplements….& be guarded about many of those, which have been over-manufactured!!
If any oncologist ever says they want to use doxorubicin (yes, Red Devil) for your chemo, ask for the medical data safety sheets and read it. You won’t let any needles near you with that poison.
“Low” side effects are a chance of 10-30% which isn’t exactly low. Heart damage is a potential side effect. (FYI you need a healthy heart.) You become so toxic that double flushing a toilet is necessary to protect others. No exchanging of bodily fluids can happen, so forget about kissing or having relations with a spouse (ever wonder why divorce is so high with women with breast cancer?) You are toxic.
You will be more frightened by the toxic drugs than by cancer. Look into alternative natural remedies, there are many that have been squashed and hidden, but the information is out there if you look.
Doxorubicin was derived from nature. It is an antitumor antibiotic. Taxoids were derived from the bark of the yew tree. These “natural” products are, indeed, very toxic. As this article pointed out, doxorubicin is effective in shrinking tumors. Many, many people have had their cancers put in remission as a result of chemotherapy. Not all chemo drugs work the same; different classes of drugs have different mechanisms of action, that’s why different drugs are often used in combination. All that being said, they are very toxic and require close monitoring. Sadly, as Ji points out, these drugs are failing to kill the cancer stem cells, allowing the cancer to return. I would much prefer to eat a food or foods without toxicity to treat my cancer if found to have superior or non-inferior effectiveness compared to chemotherapy. I remember reading a book some decades ago about a woman who ate a tremendous amount of grapes to cure her cancer. It was so long ago, I don’t remember the title. Possibly “The Grape Cure” by Brandt, published in 1929. Surprising she didn’t develop diabetes or some other problem from eating so many grapes! Thankfully, one can get grape seed extract now. GSE is also supposed to help lower blood pressure.
Labs synthesise the single ingredient from a plant substrate, which experts deem the useful ingredient to treat a disease—ignoring/omitting Co-factors needed that they could also get from the plant.
& They make their chemical analogue molecules spin the other way compared with our body’s receptor sites, all or part, as that is one way it can be patented—so, that single substance must be in big “bully” doses, to force the body to use it without its Co-factors, & despite the molecules not fitting body receptor sites properly. Battering rams cause consequences, right?
Drugs derived from plants, does not mean those are natural. Estradiol started as pregnant mare’s urine, but as a drug, it’s a refined lab analogue. Same for digoxin, Synthroid, vinpocetin, etc.—single substance & molecules spinning wrong way.
Docs commonly test blood levels for a drug given, & it looks in normal range in the serum— but that is too commonly a false reading. If a patient fails to get relief from the medicine specific to their illness, something’s wrong.
Labs can also be skewed if person is even slightly dehydrated for the lab draws….it causes false lab values for some tests (like CBCs)! (So, swill down about a quart of water, about 1 hr. ahead of the lab draw!!)
But docs have mostly been missing that, & don’t do anything to help the person find a better treatment—they just chart the drug given, & that the test shows normal limits—they did their job, according to Big Industry. Never mind, the patient did not get the memo!
About a grape cure? Keep in mind—a person eating a lotta grapes in the 1920s, probly ate seeded grapes—most folks had seeded grapes then, I think. & it’s the grape seeds that have the most healing properties, compared with the skins, which have more than the flesh. And…Time, Dose, & Distance determine a cure from a poison.
That lady’s cure, may have been coincidence, not correlation….the context is mostly missing, to get any gist of that. But, she may have only eaten just enuf grapes to keep alive, but not enuf to cause diabetes— her body got just enuf of the basic sugar, electrolytes & a few nutrients from the whole, organic grapes she ate, that the body could heal itself.
I signed up for a kaiser advantage plan (cheap premiums), to have coverage in case of emergencies, but, avoid using it most of the time—even with some emergencies, when it was clear the docs didn’t know what they were doing, or, tried to do stuff they shouldn’t.
Basically, I might go to urgent care or ER, to find out what the problem really is, IF I can’t figure it out myself.
Then, go home & use natural methods to fix it.
If at any time my methods don’t work adequately, or I can’t find a viable fix, I MIGHT return to see what docs have up their sleeves….but so far? Haven’t had to return for more advice—not even for acute chronic appendicitis (fixed it), not for skin cancers (& a breast “inflammation” not reported to them (mostly all fixed now); not for the stroke or the heart attack none of them would look at, either (fixed those).
But—I’ve only been able to do those things, because of a nursing career, lots of experience in natural & alternative methods, & a pretty blessed good ability to figure out what’s going on in this body. Not many have that ability/knowledge.
I highly recommend gaining that kind of knowledge, to increase good outcomes!
A friend recently had an epic adventure. She couldn’t get KP docs to pay attention to a fast growing itchy lump on her back, til it got to be diameter of an orange.
Suddenly, they were in a huge hurry to remove it.
It was a very invasive, aggressive form.
I suggested she get ivermectin + fenbendozole—it was tricky & vastly costlier than it should have been.
She got & started the Iver. about 2 weeks ahead of surgery—it immediately caused the lump to flatten & shrink slightly, then it tried to bounce back, then flattened & pulled from its edges again—like a living thing of its own.
She got & started the fenben. about 2 days ahead of surgery.
Prior to starting those, the growth had steadily grown, & was breaking its capsule, & trying to metastasize. Those meds stopped it, & caused the capsule to heal & contain it. A later MRI showed the spot of metastasis in the lung below it, had disappeared.
The surgery was still brutally damaging, then requiring a 2nd surgery to move a bit of other muscle & fat to fill in, skin flap to cover.
She had to be strong enuf to just say “no!” to the pushy radiologist, who tried to get her to start radiation immediately after the 1st surgery (before the 2nd surgery)—if she’d gone along with his plan, the 2nd surgery would have failed!
They don’t tell people that.
She also had to be strong enuf to just say “no,” to chemo, too.
She’s been being very careful if diet/nutrition for years, & made a few adjustments due to this event.
It’s now almost a year later, & she’s doing great! Still taking those 2v meds, but at lower doses for a few more months, to be sure it’s gone.
Such a serious subject and you also presented it in a way that a lay person could grasp. I’ll have to go over the doses again but it’s not impossible to do. Thank you very much.
Hi Roger! Great comment/concern raised. You’re right that if you just multiply the mouse dose by human body weight, you’d get ~4 g of vitamin C and ~16 g of GSE. But that’s not how scientists actually translate animal studies to humans.
Mice burn through things much faster than we do, so their per-kg dose looks way higher. To adjust for this, researchers use a standard conversion (called “human-equivalent dosing”), which shrinks the numbers down by about 12x. That’s why in the article I noted the realistic range for people is more like a few hundred mg of vitamin C and about a gram of GSE per day—not tens of grams.
So your math is right arithmetically, but the scientific translation to humans is a lot lower. In the future, I will have to put an asterisk on this to qualify.
Ah I posted the same thing as Roger, but just saw your reply so I deleted my comment . Interesting. Yes, you should definitely include that context in the body of your article next time so people know. Great post!
This is also why I long for seeded grapes!
I am having a problem finding grapes that don't have Gates "apeal" on them .the last two batches of grapes i bought , where uneditable , they were hard , and the second batch has lasted 3 weeks , so suspect . neither were marked with the apeal lable . I have been buying grapses from Sam's for years every week , I buy red table grapes . they have always been good until the last 3 weeks .
Many decades ago, Johanna Brandt published The Grape Cure. An effective easy to use cancer protocol.
Eat dark grapes and seeds.
See my comment below. Brandt’s book may have been the one I was referring to. I don’t know how easy the protocol was, because the person in the book that I read ate an enormous amount of grapes.
Grapes and grapefruit seed extract are different foods.
Spectacular article! As a cancer researcher who walked away from that outrageous and oppressive "medical" business model years ago, I am so grateful that you continue to bring such essential information to our attention. Not all may be ready to drink from the well of natural health. Nature doesn't offer "quick fix" pills or health-draining regimens that so many still believe constitute "cures." Instead Nature gently offers true healing and rejuvenation. Our deep programming to obey conventional medical demands continues to overpower our innate wisdom to trust Nature and reject the ravages of medical warfare visited upon us. I thank you for your direct and unflinching approach to educating (and freeing) us all. Namaste
Extremely articulate.
Natural food and herbs…. That is the answer!
Last year my GP wanted to test my blood but did not say why. When he gave me the results about a fortnight later, he said, “You don’t have cancer!” As if I might have been concerned about that. I was baffled into silence.
Why did he think that was a possibility? Could it be that most of his elderly clients DO have cancer? I didn’t ask because I have always surprised this doctor by refusing all pharmaceuticals and apparently, I am the only person over 60 on his list who is not swallowing handfuls of pills every few hours!
He is about as much use to me as a chocolate fire guard and a lot less nutritious.
Nice your doc offered to do that test.
But yes—medical providers (& almost everyone else) DO sucker for stereotyping!
I’m mid-70s. When I have something go haywire that I cannot figure out, I MIGHT show up in urgent care or ER. Each of the few times I have, the staff immediately stereotype a fat, old, debilitated female—who “obviously” has high BP, clogged arteries, high cholesterol, diabetes, it must be cardiovascular ills, etc…..then they start with measurements & tests…& find NONE of that (or modest cholesterol buffered by HDL..).
For which they can only flimsily try to push statins.
Or, they tried to push Paxlovid for a Covid infection (high rate of false tests, & I came in several days too late for that med—it was downright comedic!).
They end up retrenching to writing up go-home orders listing stuff I've been doing myself.
2 other times, I ended up in hospital, but all they had to offer was IV fluids—I refused to let the young surgeon cut out a big chunk of intestines with appendix (cuz of inflammation he said was visible on MRI), & went home to fix it myself (still breathing, & in better shape, 3 yrs later);
& refused surgery to remove skin cancers that flared-up at that Covid onset in 2023, & fixed those myself too, using more natural methods (did not tell them about the breast involvement—that’s been vastly improving too—I could handle dealing with their pushing surgery for things they could easily see were healing, but did not want to deal with their attitudes for breast involvement)
They dunno what to think. Their model is, put people on drugs for life. I told ‘em, I use a LOT of various supplements, BUT, as-needed, for some special need, or, if I don’t eat nutritiously enuf…so, as-needed.
I don’t take drugs if those are avoidable—pretty much most if not all, can be.
I don’t agree to their model of doing things, much of the time.
The more success at DIY naturally, the less use of commercial healthcare I need—except maybe in a dire emergency.
Natural can take longer.
Sometimes it can be pretty fast though.
It’s worth it. It’s gentler. It usually leaves no scars.
It’s far less traumatic. It’s definitely less costly.
The industry really hates that—but I love it!
And—it requires education, experience, & more, to hope to get it right. I’m an RN with much experience in natural methods, which has served me well, doing for self & family.
A friend had been piffled-off when she asked docs about a very itchy sore on her back, til it got diameter of an orange.
After they finally told her hurry up get surgery for it, She called me; I knew she routinely cared for rescue cats. In conversation, it came out one cat claw had poked skin where the lesion started.
Cat claws, especially rescues/ferals, commonly have parasites & all kinds of germs; the claw essentially seeded-in whatever organisms were residue on that claw!
Same docs who piffled it off for almost a year, said it’s the worse kind of cancer, it’ll kill you regardless, we can only buy time….
I encouraged her to find a doc who’d taken over our old docs practice.
Get ivermectin & fenbendazole.
She got the Ivermectin about 3 weeks ahead of surgery, but the fenben didn’t arrive til 2 days before.
She started each as soon as rec’d.
Each dose, she could feel the tumor shrink from its margins & flatten, then as dose wore off, it rebounded.
The scan before surgery showed a tiny metastasis in her lung, under the tumor.
Surgeon very surprised to find tumor was totally contained in membrane.
They did a very radical (down to scraping ribs) surgery.
She still reported feeling hugely better right after. Within a week, she was back doing yard work, tho, limiting how long or heavy.
The assigned radiologist not only tried to push—hard—for her to start that immediately, he & staff tried to get her labeled “mental” for refusing blood transfusion, & for refusing radiation treatment.
Here’s the key for those sorts:
tell them, “I appreciate your input, but I think it is prudent to wait til after the reconstructive surgery, & then, to wait & see.”
Some arrangement of words that conveys to pushy docs, you appreciate their advice, take it under advisement, but that you choose to wait & see, watch & wait, before jumping to conclusions.
Her plastic surgeon who did reconstructive, told her: “very good you did Not jump into radiation treatments yet, or reconstructive couldn’t work nearly as well!”
Follow-up scans: the lung metastasis was gone. No others found. Everything healing very UNexpectedly well.
The docs are baffled, cuz their prognosis was dire, as-in, put your affairs in order.
She has beaten all their odds. It’s about 2 years after, now, & by their estimates, she should at least be in hospice, if not 6’ under.
She’s happily doing heavy gardening, housework, part-time job, & elder care for both her elderly parents. She is about in her mid-60s.
She follows a paleo diet, very low carbs or starch; lots of fresh produce from her yard. She continues on reduced doses of those 2 meds, supervised by different doc.
She has not, to date, told the regular docs about taking the 2 meds.
A patient at our old office, end-stage pancreatic cancer. Chose to try experimental protocol using only USP pure reduced L-glutathione.
Note: debilitated older people’s bodies cannot make much of it, nor from eating precursors; so need the ready-to-absorb substance.
He cycled thru the protocol about 3 times in about 5 months.
His other (diagnosing) docs could not find any cancers after.
Commentary:
I’ve met one woman who struggles w/cancers, who said the 2 meds did not help her. She has struggled w/various types of cancers for several years.
But, she did not say what doses, or how long she took them.
Docs are notorious for UNDER prescribing the right Antifungals & antiparasite meds, IF they do at all, that can go systemic, long enuf; they also often fail to monitor liver & kidney function during use of them.
There are herbal versions of antifungal/antiparasites, some safer, & as effective.
Heroic doses of Reduced L-glutathione are terrific at stopping infections of all kinds. It is a fierce antioxidants, & helps healing. BUT it is acidic. In huge doses, it MIGHT add to kidney stones—tho the scientists I spoke with, said it did not.
If I may ask, what did you use for skin cancer? Was it SCC?
I think they claimed it was Basel cell. But none of them had done anything about previous lesions that had looked FAR worse.
I think, based on knowledge & experience, they try to make specific labels, but, there are too many variables to really pinpoint things, way too often.
For all efforts, dietary is KEY. Low carbs, especially starches & sugars. I even needed to quit fruits for a longish time. Those all caused noticeable worsening if eaten. As organic as able. Vegan can be used longer-term than keto—keto is great to quickly reduce inflammation, then, gradually change to vegan….plenty of solid data showing well-balanced vegan can heal many end-stage cardiovascular & cancers. There’s more.
For previous lesions, which looked different:
I had fewer things I knew to do, so looked at those in context of what signs they showed. The bigger, leakier ones had features/signs of impetigo, so used an OTC antibiotic that specifically targeted that component. Next, an antifungal topical. Then, used herbal topicals. Got those (biggest about size of quarter) down to about 1/4” diameter, then used a heated dinner knife blade, flat on the remaining spots, to burn the germs left, that kept trying to return. Must be very careful not to burn too deep—only sizzled the top for a couple split seconds, enuf to blister lightly. . Then used inner-leaf gel from fresh cut aloe, twice daily.
In the last 20 years or so, a couple times, had suspicious textures & pains in one breast. Triaging signs/symptoms, It kinda reminded me of when I nursed my 1st baby, & got infections. But the textures of it were different. For all those, I’d applied heating pad, as hot as I could stand without causing a burn, to induce artificial local fever, for about 30 minutes daily for about a week…problem solved.
But by the time the stabbing knife pains woke me in 12/2023, I had gotten a medical-grade red/infrared light gadget, that delivered a range of light spectrum from about 650 to 1015 Hertz (Hz). Heat IS infrared light, even tho it is not visible to our eyes.
I used that red gadget first, & it stopped the scale-10 pain in elbo & breast, within about 10 minutes. I kept using that gadget on the problem areas, til it’s charge ran out, & repeated daily for about a week.
Most of the lesions on elbo & nose were removed by the biopsy, I think. She was a bit sloppy on the nose one, so there remained a scant bit of cells at the edges.
I kept using the Red gadget, & diet, herbals, nutrients—various as they seemed indicated.
To date: the elbo randomly signals pain, wich might be a warning; similar for breast. I use the Red gadget, & those are again reduced/gone. I don’t claim to be “healed”.
I do state: watch/observe, & IF anything seems to try to return, AND does not respond to my tactics, THEN I would seek the docs, & MIGHT allow surgery, IF things were bad enuf.
But I very much doubt ever using “chemo”, & certainly not radiation. Radiation as a “treatment”, is based on faked researches for many decades (I was staff for one of the big ones); it burns tissues, preventing surgical wounds from properly healing.
Now, there are even internet scammers trying to rewrite history of radiation sources (radium, spec.), painting it as safe, & used since the 1800s…hogwash!—kinda like flat-earthers have tried to get foljs to believe that.
There are scammers & influencers who try to promote very iffy & fake stuff. Beware of those. Just because “nature grew it”, does Not mean something is 100% safe! (Or even safe for many)
There’s plenty of big indust’s with deeply vested interests in convincing public to avoid natural stuff, pushing-back against using natural methods; containing half-truths & whole lies, incl. heavy doses of bogus marketing psych..
One must learn how their body really works; study old & new info, use common sense. Include historical context & info….some goes back thousands of years.
Superb, thank you.
Thank you for this amazing article that can help even the most indigent sufferers of Rockefeller medicine. May G-d shine down on you with unlimited blessings Preserving this article now.
Geoff Wexler
https://TurboCancer.org
Amazing work. Thank you so much!!
https://www.naturalcancercures.org/brandt-grape-cure.html
Have you heard of the Grape cure?
The first study you referenced argued that a standard amount of vitamin c that many people get daily shrinks tumors over 50%. While I'm sure many people aren't getting grapes in their diet, I would think most are getting vitamin c.
It would seem that there should be a lot less cancer than there is if vitamin c alone is so effective. Or am I missing something?
I might tend to think, that the type/source of C matters. Almost all supplements sold, are lab-made C analogue, ascorbic acid. That follows big industry model, of focusing on a purified, lab-made single ingredient the “experts” claim is just as good or better, than getting natural food sourced nutrients.
Lab made analogue supplements are often different than natural ones, because for some reason, even tho “science” knows better, industry equates the natural with lab-made—but they are not.
Most lab-made nutrient substitutes not only lack all the Co-factors that should come with the “main ingredient” in foods, to help the body use it…..But the very molecules made in labs, are turning the wrong way! Molecules’ energy must fit into the body’s receptor sites’ own energy—if lab made molecules spin backwards, they cannot plug into or do the needed job in the body as well. So, ya might think you swallowed 1 gram of ascorbic acid C, the body cannot use it nearly as well—that might look more like only eating maybe 50mg., or such.
Also….
Manufactures foods mostly start by using GMOd/glyphosated foods grown by AgriBiz. Glyphosate was first registered as an antibiotic!…then changed to being a defoliant. Which also kills off the life in the soil (& your gut biota…). The soil biota are critically important for carrying minerals from rocks & dirt, into receptors on plant roots. The industrialized farms replace only a fraction of needed nutrients using basic fertilizers—enuf to grow cosmetically “nice” produce, but not containing the full array of nutrients to sustain life in a healthy way—for the plant nor the creatures that eat it. Grains can have 2 or 3 applications of glyphosate on them—which food makers cannot, as far as I know, remove—so—people & other critters have been eating those.
There’s also “field washing” (dunking produce in a bucket of water—industry calls that “processing”)…which allows the produce to get irradiated lightly, to kill germs on it, to extend shelf-life—without labelling. …Or, it gets sprayed with bgates’ chemical coating to preserve it—but, humans aren’t s’posed to consume that quantity of that substance—& it’s a lab analogue of the real substance, to make it patentable—none know the long-term affects! THEN…food manufacturers start processing it even more, which further decreases nutritional content…. See where that is all going?
So, even when someone ..thinks.. they are eating plenty of C from foods, or supplements—it is entirely dependent on IF or How Much the food is actually organic, & how much it’s been processed, & what other additives were put into it, that might interrupt the body using any nutrients in the foods consumed.
And…Consumer/Social Engineering (industries convincing consumers to buy what they’re selling & consume it more, faster…)….has helped millions more folks “choose” to avoid eating the seeds & peels of produce or fish or chicken—where much of the concentrated nutrients are. Industries remove peels, skins, bones, seeds, & sell those downstream to other industries to make saleable products, instead of folks getting to eat those to keep us healthier. They denature foods & ingredients from those, to have longer shelflife.
Also, it depends on what & how much of the other many thousands of hormone & nutrient interrupting manmade chemicals a person is also exposed to, 24/7. Last I knew, no one gave industries permission to make them chronically ill from billions of manmade products, to suffer for years or decades before we die prematurely to serve oligarch’s depopulation agenda. No amount of forced pregnancies can bail-out big industries’ from their longer than 200 years of malfeasant corruption.
Overall, relatively few get enuf of anything like a full array of nutrients, much less daily.
& most are having chemical compounds interrupt them getting or using the nutrients they do get. Or, the exposures are overwhelming, so start disease processes when bodies lack enuf nutrients to ward those off.
& The Industry makes sure most docs are mostly ignorant of all that & more, so they don’t look or test for it. Most commercial docs fail to recognize malnutrition unless it’s so bad it can’t be missed. Most will totally miss chemical exposures in patients, or, when patients tell their docs, the docs don’t know what to do about it.
Does that help ?
Docs like Sayer & folks who learn from them, are doing better than most, by getting educated enuf to chose more wisely what they consume, & what they chose to help themselves with, using more natural methods. A big % of us learned the hard way, by going thru many rounds of malpractice foisted on us as “healthcare”, that we must be our own best advocate, cuz industries are not.
So, it’s necessary, increasingly, to get nutrients we need, using Natural-based supplements….& be guarded about many of those, which have been over-manufactured!!
If any oncologist ever says they want to use doxorubicin (yes, Red Devil) for your chemo, ask for the medical data safety sheets and read it. You won’t let any needles near you with that poison.
“Low” side effects are a chance of 10-30% which isn’t exactly low. Heart damage is a potential side effect. (FYI you need a healthy heart.) You become so toxic that double flushing a toilet is necessary to protect others. No exchanging of bodily fluids can happen, so forget about kissing or having relations with a spouse (ever wonder why divorce is so high with women with breast cancer?) You are toxic.
You will be more frightened by the toxic drugs than by cancer. Look into alternative natural remedies, there are many that have been squashed and hidden, but the information is out there if you look.
Doxorubicin was derived from nature. It is an antitumor antibiotic. Taxoids were derived from the bark of the yew tree. These “natural” products are, indeed, very toxic. As this article pointed out, doxorubicin is effective in shrinking tumors. Many, many people have had their cancers put in remission as a result of chemotherapy. Not all chemo drugs work the same; different classes of drugs have different mechanisms of action, that’s why different drugs are often used in combination. All that being said, they are very toxic and require close monitoring. Sadly, as Ji points out, these drugs are failing to kill the cancer stem cells, allowing the cancer to return. I would much prefer to eat a food or foods without toxicity to treat my cancer if found to have superior or non-inferior effectiveness compared to chemotherapy. I remember reading a book some decades ago about a woman who ate a tremendous amount of grapes to cure her cancer. It was so long ago, I don’t remember the title. Possibly “The Grape Cure” by Brandt, published in 1929. Surprising she didn’t develop diabetes or some other problem from eating so many grapes! Thankfully, one can get grape seed extract now. GSE is also supposed to help lower blood pressure.
Labs synthesise the single ingredient from a plant substrate, which experts deem the useful ingredient to treat a disease—ignoring/omitting Co-factors needed that they could also get from the plant.
& They make their chemical analogue molecules spin the other way compared with our body’s receptor sites, all or part, as that is one way it can be patented—so, that single substance must be in big “bully” doses, to force the body to use it without its Co-factors, & despite the molecules not fitting body receptor sites properly. Battering rams cause consequences, right?
Drugs derived from plants, does not mean those are natural. Estradiol started as pregnant mare’s urine, but as a drug, it’s a refined lab analogue. Same for digoxin, Synthroid, vinpocetin, etc.—single substance & molecules spinning wrong way.
Docs commonly test blood levels for a drug given, & it looks in normal range in the serum— but that is too commonly a false reading. If a patient fails to get relief from the medicine specific to their illness, something’s wrong.
Labs can also be skewed if person is even slightly dehydrated for the lab draws….it causes false lab values for some tests (like CBCs)! (So, swill down about a quart of water, about 1 hr. ahead of the lab draw!!)
But docs have mostly been missing that, & don’t do anything to help the person find a better treatment—they just chart the drug given, & that the test shows normal limits—they did their job, according to Big Industry. Never mind, the patient did not get the memo!
About a grape cure? Keep in mind—a person eating a lotta grapes in the 1920s, probly ate seeded grapes—most folks had seeded grapes then, I think. & it’s the grape seeds that have the most healing properties, compared with the skins, which have more than the flesh. And…Time, Dose, & Distance determine a cure from a poison.
That lady’s cure, may have been coincidence, not correlation….the context is mostly missing, to get any gist of that. But, she may have only eaten just enuf grapes to keep alive, but not enuf to cause diabetes— her body got just enuf of the basic sugar, electrolytes & a few nutrients from the whole, organic grapes she ate, that the body could heal itself.
You’re correct. Thanks for the effort in adding the details.
Nutin' new here.
Same ol shit from the high-status murderers.
STOP giving them your premiums, stop giving them your tax dollars & stop giving them office visits. Friends don't let friends go to MDs.
Love that last line!!
I signed up for a kaiser advantage plan (cheap premiums), to have coverage in case of emergencies, but, avoid using it most of the time—even with some emergencies, when it was clear the docs didn’t know what they were doing, or, tried to do stuff they shouldn’t.
Basically, I might go to urgent care or ER, to find out what the problem really is, IF I can’t figure it out myself.
Then, go home & use natural methods to fix it.
If at any time my methods don’t work adequately, or I can’t find a viable fix, I MIGHT return to see what docs have up their sleeves….but so far? Haven’t had to return for more advice—not even for acute chronic appendicitis (fixed it), not for skin cancers (& a breast “inflammation” not reported to them (mostly all fixed now); not for the stroke or the heart attack none of them would look at, either (fixed those).
But—I’ve only been able to do those things, because of a nursing career, lots of experience in natural & alternative methods, & a pretty blessed good ability to figure out what’s going on in this body. Not many have that ability/knowledge.
I highly recommend gaining that kind of knowledge, to increase good outcomes!
Add Fenbendazole/Mebendazole and Ivermectin.
Likely an amazing increase in effectiveness.
A friend recently had an epic adventure. She couldn’t get KP docs to pay attention to a fast growing itchy lump on her back, til it got to be diameter of an orange.
Suddenly, they were in a huge hurry to remove it.
It was a very invasive, aggressive form.
I suggested she get ivermectin + fenbendozole—it was tricky & vastly costlier than it should have been.
She got & started the Iver. about 2 weeks ahead of surgery—it immediately caused the lump to flatten & shrink slightly, then it tried to bounce back, then flattened & pulled from its edges again—like a living thing of its own.
She got & started the fenben. about 2 days ahead of surgery.
Prior to starting those, the growth had steadily grown, & was breaking its capsule, & trying to metastasize. Those meds stopped it, & caused the capsule to heal & contain it. A later MRI showed the spot of metastasis in the lung below it, had disappeared.
The surgery was still brutally damaging, then requiring a 2nd surgery to move a bit of other muscle & fat to fill in, skin flap to cover.
She had to be strong enuf to just say “no!” to the pushy radiologist, who tried to get her to start radiation immediately after the 1st surgery (before the 2nd surgery)—if she’d gone along with his plan, the 2nd surgery would have failed!
They don’t tell people that.
She also had to be strong enuf to just say “no,” to chemo, too.
She’s been being very careful if diet/nutrition for years, & made a few adjustments due to this event.
It’s now almost a year later, & she’s doing great! Still taking those 2v meds, but at lower doses for a few more months, to be sure it’s gone.
I’ll be sharing this article with her, too!
Such a serious subject and you also presented it in a way that a lay person could grasp. I’ll have to go over the doses again but it’s not impossible to do. Thank you very much.
They are sick, knowing that there is a cure, but because $$$ means More then Life, these demons need to be locked up
This is incredible research. Thank you for sharing, Dr.
I weigh 180 lbs or about 81.65kg, so 50 X 81.65 = 4,082.5mg or about 4 grams of vitamin C
200 X 81.65 = 16,330mg or about 16.3 grams of GSE
Is my math wrong?
Hi Roger! Great comment/concern raised. You’re right that if you just multiply the mouse dose by human body weight, you’d get ~4 g of vitamin C and ~16 g of GSE. But that’s not how scientists actually translate animal studies to humans.
Mice burn through things much faster than we do, so their per-kg dose looks way higher. To adjust for this, researchers use a standard conversion (called “human-equivalent dosing”), which shrinks the numbers down by about 12x. That’s why in the article I noted the realistic range for people is more like a few hundred mg of vitamin C and about a gram of GSE per day—not tens of grams.
So your math is right arithmetically, but the scientific translation to humans is a lot lower. In the future, I will have to put an asterisk on this to qualify.
Ah I posted the same thing as Roger, but just saw your reply so I deleted my comment . Interesting. Yes, you should definitely include that context in the body of your article next time so people know. Great post!
I have G6PD , so I have to be careful to keep my Vit C dose low enough to not trigger that enzyme that causes anemia .
Depending upon how many snps you have, niacin is the hack for G6PD.
Thank you ,I did not know this . I do take 100mg. twice a day .