A preregistered systematic review in Expert Review of Vaccines found 70 vaccinated transmitters, 812 downstream cases, and one small study underneath the claim that MMR reduces onward spread.
Fantastic Article Sayer! - I have known about this MMR shedding for many years due to a personal and tragic experience. I was a social worker who made home visits. I visited a child who had recently been given the MMR shot. She promptly developed measles symptoms and was quite ill when I saw her. At the time I thought nothing of it and I spent over an hour with her in close quarters. Two weeks later I came down with a fever and huge rash. - In addition, I didn't I know it at the time, but I was also newly pregnant. When my OBGYN saw my rash, she panicked and tested me for measles exposure. A blood test confirmed that I HAD been exposed to vaccine strain measles (very likely from the child I had visited). This exposure to vaccine strain measles caused me to lose the pregnancy because the baby had hydrocephalus (a documented fatal issue to fetuses who's mothers are exposed to measles in early pregnancy). It was an extremely tragic loss for me. At the time, all my doctors openly admitted that it WAS NOT UNCOMMON for measles to be transmitted from those given the MMR shot to others who were vaccinated or not. Now-a-days, no doctor would be allowed to admit that the MMR vaccine sheds. But at the time of my experience, doctors had not yet been bullied into silence on this issue.
Too bad the study reaffirms the value of measles vax. “Two-dose measles vaccination programs with high coverage have enabled many countries to eliminate measles, with elimination defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a lack of endemic transmission in a jurisdiction for ≥1 year, in the presence of high-quality measles surveillance [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. By 2023, 44% of countries (84/193) had verified measles elimination [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. As time passes since elimination, the proportion of the population solely protected through”
Are you joking? I’m referring to the study being discussed in this very post. So you’re saying Sr Sayer Li here endorses tainted studies. Make it make sense
No joke. The vast majority of studies being discussed in any posts will come from the same biased sources. As such, I take them with a giant grain of salt. Now, tell me, since you read the study... how was the 44% eradication verified to be eliminated? Who set the parameters, and how did they verify them?
30 years ago, my daughter got the MMR. She developed a rash and had a low grade fever… (measles)… she promptly gave it to my almost 70 year old mother, who got a very light rash, and fever. Both were over it fairly quickly…
These so-called “experts” are at the very best incompetent, but at the worst are showing absolute maleficence.
My grandson got a long 104-degree temperature & ASD from his forced [at-gun point] MMR vax, from our 62 billion in fraud fines and leader in cause of * death medicine! (* See Dr. Null' et-al well documented book Death by Medicine!) Claiming 800,000 medicines caused deaths a year, or 24 million in the last 30 years! Nothing to worry about there, right? [Note: I only lost my Dad, Wife, & best friend to iatrogenic "medicine!"
Sorry. I've lost many family members, associates and friends to "modern" medicine. As many or more that could have been lost in another time period on earth. I can't fathom how anyone would put one ounce of trust in a system that has murdered millions, perhaps billions of people since it's inception
I am so sorry for your losses Mr. Steve. I just lifted you up in prayer.
“For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.”
Todays, systematic review found vaccinated transmitters 'shed' measles, too. I believe many knew this years ago. Covid 19 was not the only vax that 'shed.' The human race would have been far healthier, if vaccines had not been invented Childhood diseases.were dropping, in the 1950s, because of sanitation and better nutrition, before the big Vax promotion started. . Guess who took credit for the drop? Enterprising vaccine manufacturers. By the 1980s, they were facing a slew of multi-million dollar lawsuits for 'deadly and defective vaccines.' The vax manufacturers went to their 'buddies' in congress and told them they would no longer be in business, because of ll the lawsuits. Congress gave them a gift...The National childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which removed all their liability for injuries and deaths.. There was a condition, which was never kept. Every two years, the vaccines were to be tested by a Third Party not connected to the vaccine industry. Vaccines would never have passed a valid test. Legitimate testing would have shown that ''vaccines were not safe & effective.' This would have ended this heinous National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 that our own congress ignorantly created. Instead, congress did free advertising and promotion for the vax industry by making it mandatory for school children to get vaccines in order to attend school. The Vax Industry has contributed greatly in lowering the health of the American people. We used to be #1 in World health. Now we are in 47th Place. Contact your representatives. Tell them to Rescind The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 and make the vaccine industry pay for the damage they have done...not the American taxpayers.
You said it! The vax industry would never have been as rich and powerful, if our money-worshipping congress had not given it this Act. Lobbyists should never have been permitted in Washington, D.C. bribing our congressmen..
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS or the Department), in support of the Task Force on Safer Childhood Vaccines and in furtherance of the Executive Order of August 10, 2026, “Delivering Gold Standard Childhood Vaccine Recommendations for Americans,” seeks public comment on whether the categories currently used in Federal vaccine recommendations are adequate. Those categories are routine (universal) recommendations, risk-based recommendations, and recommendations based on shared clinical decision-making, also referred to as individual-based decision-making. The Department seeks comment on these categories and whether additional or different categories should be adopted. The Department further seeks comment on the considerations that should be relied upon in setting vaccine recommendations, including the availability and strength of available scientific evidence, the appropriate approach when randomized controlled trial evidence is limited or absent, a presumption in favor of individual autonomy and religious freedom, the downstream legal and programmatic consequences of category assignment, and the communication practices necessary to earn and maintain public trust.
To be assured consideration, comments must be received no later than September 20, 2026.
I added my 2 cents...and I am sure that it wasn't particularly wanted. The focus on money and industry will destroy America. It has gone downhill greatly in the last 75 years...and if this continues...we will be no more.
False. Stop spreading misinformation. The very paper in question goes against your conclusion “Two-dose measles vaccination programs with high coverage have enabled many countries to eliminate measles, with elimination defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a lack of endemic transmission in a jurisdiction for ≥1 year, in the presence of high-quality measles surveillance [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. By 2023, 44% of countries (84/193) had verified measles elimination [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. As time passes since elimination, the proportion of the population solely protected through”
Sorry, I don't understand where you are coming from...What misinformation did I spread? I simply said that I added my two cents to a document requiring comments!
And Fauci confessed the same. Fauci admitted in the Annals of Internal Medicine Journal that injected vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission.
"Administration of parenterally administered vaccines alone typically does not result in potent mucosal immunity that might interrupt infection or transmission (9)."
It fails a 100% in preventing infection or transmission.
Even kids know wounds must be kept clean and infection avoided. It takes insane doctors to purposely create a wound using a needle, damage nerves and then pump a live virus into the wound. That too a virus that has been engineered using gain-of-function work to infect nerves via CD46.
"eliminate measles"
We depend on natural measles infection for good health. "Public health" is too stupid to understand the root cause, big picture of ANYTHING. So their "solutions" are worse than the "problems". We are making measles endemic as nature meant it to be.
"2ndary infections" are iatrogenic. The best time to be exposed/infected with measles is as an infant while protected by passive maternal immunity. Measles is so mild then, it cannot even be diagnosed. No secondary infections. "Public health" created all this nonsense with their quackccines.
This demonstrates an ever lack of historical knowledge of how bad measles and small pox actually got. And guess what, mRNA vaccines can be passed onto kids through breast milk, meaning they have “natural“ immunity
you still haven't cited any evidence that measles vaccines have 100% failure rate. Not one. Goofy as unrelated zenodo citations don't to it. Your own "research" doesn't do it. Show me a third party URL.
Nonsense. An immunology textbook tells you don't do insane stuff like injecting alien proteins into humans. So ALL injected vaccines are INSANITY.
Do you know the meaning of the word ANAPHYLAXIS? It means OPPOSITE OF PROTECTION. Nobel Laureate Richet taught you in 1913 that INJECTING ALIEN PROTEINS not only fails to protect, IT IS THE OPPOSITE OF PROTECTION, it makes it worse.
They teach you in medical school that injecting egg protein into guinea pigs causes the development of deadly allergy/asthma. You REGULARLY inject egg proteins (flu shots) and 1000s of other alien proteins into humans.
Isn't this what they want to spread disease and poison? People who are vaccinated should where a badge saying "I have just been vaccinated" so we know to stay clear of them.
A pharmacist told me about a month ago that it was time for my shingles and pneumonia shots. I only went to the pharmacy to pick up NSAIDS I was prescribed, which I didn't ask for nor take. When I went to foot doctors in May and June of this year. All I wanted was medical documentation to qualify me for FMLA. My foot pain qualifies me for it. As for the pharmacist I told him I didn't take vaccines. Flue, pneumonia or shingles are the least of my concerns.
And that's not counting all the other negative effects either, and deaths never attributed to the vaccine and which would never be reported even if all cases were reported.
Thank you for sharing this information! With two of my children having immediate severe adverse events which left permanent neuro damage (causation - not just correlation!) - one son at 3 months old with the old DTP (before attenuation) and the other son at 15 months old from his MMR, I am not a fan of vaccines. I'm also not a scientist and not able to investigate what is truly valid and reliable scientific research, as well as vaccine theory. From what I currently understand, there is little validity and reliability in much of medical science. And now that I have experienced and understand more than I did when I was totally clueless when my now adult children were babies, as to the dangers of vaccines 37 and 42 years ago, I share my experience with many new parents so that they can at least make an informed decision regarding their babies. If I can spare any parent from the heartbreaking experiences my family has endured, I do so. I have communicated with many families who have experienced similarly to us. The increase in learning disabilities, developmental delays and the number of children now receiving Special Ed services is astonishing compared to the 1950's-1960's. Neuro-divergency has become the norm. When I was in elementary school, we had one child out of all 3 of our 3rd grade classrooms, who had a reputation for being what the teacher called "a character". He displayed hyperactivity: wouldn't/couldn't stay in his seat, impulsive with cracking jokes aloud and interrupting, emotion regulation problems - perhaps he'd be labeled ADHD today and probably medicated with toxic drugs. We had one overweight boy and one overweight girl out of ALL our classrooms from K through the 6th grade- and there were three 6th grade classrooms of about 30 children each when the school nurse weighed all 6th graders in the gym at the same time. We sat on the floor and the nurse, recorder and a scale stood at the front of the room. Everyone could hear the nurse pronounce the weight to the recorder. I felt badly for the only two kids who were overweight out of about 90 6th graders. Both appeared humiliated at the pronouncement of their weight. Terrible practice! In 4th-6th there was only one girl who seemed intellectually challenged far below the norm compared to the rest of us. We had one child, also K-6th, who was what was called a "juvenile delinquent": naughty, engaged in thievery, fights, property damage, "played hooky." Unfortunately, he ended up in a 1965 juvenile hall at only 12 or 13 years old. (He probably went on to become a successful day-trader. JK JK) If we had any autistic children, we didn't realize it or they were elsewhere in special programs or institutions. We had one girl who was a thalidomide baby; and, she was missing both legs and one arm and used prostheses and ambulated remarkably well. Her name was Mickey and she was very kind, good natured and had a smile that lit up the room! To what degree vaccines, drugs, environmental toxins, unhealthy foods, water and depleted soils have contributed to the myriad health problems of children (and adults) today is difficult to measure. All I know is my peers and I received only two vaccinations during childhood, smallpox and oral polio - and maybe a sole tetanus shot- and we spent most of our time outside playing games, ball sports of all kinds, exploring the nearby woods, riding bikes. When we got the chicken pox, friend's Mom's would actually send their child over to the sick kid's house hoping they'd "catch" it for the good of immunizing the community?? Same with measles. I also do not remember one kid in our Long Island school or neighborhood becoming maimed or dying from measles or chicken pox either. I have a steel trap memory for details, too. Not one child in our school developed polio from the oral polio vaccine administered by the school lunch cashier! I remember that day like it was yesterday. Perhaps, the oral polio was "safe and effective?" I don't know.... (And to confuse matters...My Mom spent a year in a hospital in Brooklyn at age 11-12, much of the time confined to a wheelchair due to polio. One leg ended up about 3/8" shorter than the other but she went on to have a Yoga School and was a yoga and aerobics dance instructor for 30 years. Needless to say, she thought it was great the school gave us the oral polio vaccine during lunch time. ) Deceptions abound; greed and lust for power and bad intentions are rampant on this planet; and, each of us needs to develop excellent discernment, critical thinking skills, and not lose heart or common sense. We must be willing to think and perceive outside our own narrow limited paradigms, especially amidst the technological trajectory we're on in this Information Age, so that we can combat the many malevolent forces and voices working upon us. I'm grateful for the work Sayer Ji and others do to investigate and attempt to discover what is true.
### Yes, Vaccinated People Can Spread Measles. That Is Not What This Study Shows.
Sayer Ji's article is built around a legitimate finding, but it draws a much larger conclusion from that finding than the underlying evidence supports.
The new systematic review by Wright et al. is worth discussing. It found that vaccinated people who nevertheless developed measles can, in some circumstances, transmit the virus to other people. Across the reports included in the review, 70 of 890 vaccinated measles cases were documented as transmitting measles, producing 237 direct secondary cases. That finding is real. It is also not particularly surprising: measles vaccination is highly effective, but it does not create an absolute biological guarantee that a vaccinated person can never become infected or transmit virus.
The problem begins when that finding is converted into the much broader claim that vaccination therefore does not substantially prevent measles transmission.
**The study did not demonstrate that.**
In fact, the authors explicitly caution against making that comparison. Their review specifically selected reports in which transmission from vaccinated cases had been documented. Consequently, the 70/890 figure cannot be interpreted as the percentage of all vaccinated people who develop measles who will transmit it under ordinary circumstances. It is a figure from a selected collection of outbreak investigations.
That distinction matters enormously.
If investigators deliberately collect cases in which an unusual event occurred, the frequency of that event in the selected dataset cannot automatically be generalized to the underlying population.
The headline number — **7.9%** — therefore needs a very large asterisk.
It does **not** mean:
> 7.9% of vaccinated people transmit measles.
It does **not** mean:
> 7.9% of vaccinated people who get measles transmit measles in the general population.
And it certainly does not mean:
> vaccination fails to prevent measles transmission in 92.1% of cases.
It means that 70 of the 890 vaccinated measles cases represented in these selected reports were documented as transmitters.
Those are very different propositions.
### The more important question is missing
The scientifically important comparison is not:
**Can a vaccinated person transmit measles?**
The answer is clearly yes.
The important question is:
**How efficiently does a vaccinated person with breakthrough measles transmit compared with an unvaccinated person with measles?**
The Wright review was not designed to answer that question.
And that omission matters because other research has specifically examined transmission following vaccination failure.
A 2024 systematic review of onward transmission after secondary vaccine failure identified 109 measles cases associated with secondary vaccine failure. Eleven of those cases transmitted measles, producing 23 onward infections. The investigators estimated an effective reproduction number of only **0.063** (95% CI 0–0.5). They concluded that the risk of onward transmission from people experiencing secondary vaccine failure was **very low**, although not zero.
That is a dramatically different epidemiological picture from suggesting that breakthrough cases transmit measles in anything approaching the same way as susceptible, unvaccinated cases.
And it makes biological sense.
Vaccination does not have to provide sterilizing immunity in 100% of recipients to reduce transmission. Partial or waning immunity can still reduce viral replication, alter the clinical presentation, reduce viral burden, shorten infectiousness, and substantially reduce the probability of infecting someone else.
The 2024 review specifically notes that measles following secondary vaccine failure is generally milder and associated with lower viral loads.
So the existence of breakthrough transmission is not evidence against a substantial reduction in transmission.
### The “31% had two doses” argument is also being overinterpreted
The review found that 22 of the 70 documented vaccinated transmitters had received at least two doses.
That is 31%.
But what does that number actually tell us?
Very little about the effectiveness of two doses.
The denominator is **70 documented vaccinated transmitters**, not all people who received two doses and subsequently encountered measles.
It therefore cannot establish that 31% of fully vaccinated people transmit measles.
It cannot establish that two-dose vaccination provides little protection against transmission.
And it certainly cannot establish that the second dose is somehow responsible for transmission.
Indeed, the original implication that the second dose itself was the problematic dose was subsequently corrected. That correction was appropriate because the data simply cannot support that inference.
### The vaccine-strain speculation goes even further beyond the evidence
The article also raises the possibility that some of the transmission attributed to vaccinated people might involve vaccine-strain virus.
This is a reasonable scientific question to investigate.
It is not evidence that vaccine-strain virus caused any of these documented transmission chains.
Those are two entirely different things.
The review itself does not establish that the 70 vaccinated transmitters were transmitting vaccine-strain measles virus. The existence of vaccine-virus RNA or vaccine-associated viral replication does not establish person-to-person transmission of vaccine-strain virus.
If someone wants to argue that vaccine-strain transmission explains some of these cases, the burden is straightforward: demonstrate it through appropriate viral sequencing and epidemiologic linkage.
Until then, it is speculation.
### What the study actually tells us
The most defensible interpretation of the new paper is considerably less dramatic:
**Breakthrough measles can occasionally be transmitted by vaccinated individuals, and outbreak investigators should not assume that a vaccinated measles case is incapable of transmitting the virus.**
That is useful information.
It may change how individual outbreaks are investigated.
It does not overturn the much larger body of evidence showing that measles vaccination substantially reduces infection and transmission.
There is an important difference between saying:
> “Vaccinated people can sometimes transmit measles.”
and saying:
> “Vaccination does not prevent measles transmission.”
The first statement is supported.
The second does not follow.
### Look at what is actually happening during the current resurgence
There is also a straightforward reality check available in the current U.S. outbreak data.
As of September 3, 2026, CDC reports **3,134 confirmed U.S. measles cases** for 2026, with **95% outbreak-associated**.
Current surveillance also shows that the overwhelming majority of reported cases occur in people who are unvaccinated or whose vaccination status is unknown. A recent national summary reported approximately **93% of 2026 cases** in that category.
That doesn't prove that vaccinated people never transmit measles. They clearly can.
It does, however, put the Wright paper into its proper epidemiological context.
If vaccinated breakthrough cases were the major engine of measles transmission, we would expect the epidemiologic pattern to look very different.
Instead, the current resurgence is occurring in the setting of immunity gaps, with outbreaks disproportionately involving people who are unvaccinated or whose vaccination status is unknown.
That is entirely compatible with a vaccine that is highly effective but not perfect.
### The real scientific lesson is more nuanced
There is no contradiction in all of the following statements being true simultaneously:
1. Two-dose measles vaccination is highly effective at preventing measles.
2. A small proportion of vaccinated people can nevertheless develop breakthrough infection.
3. Some of those breakthrough cases can transmit measles.
4. Breakthrough transmission is not zero.
5. Breakthrough cases generally transmit much less efficiently than susceptible unvaccinated cases.
6. Vaccination therefore substantially reduces, but does not mathematically eliminate, the possibility of transmission.
That is what the evidence actually supports.
The mistake in Ji's article is not pointing out that breakthrough transmission exists.
**The mistake is treating proof that transmission is possible as proof that vaccination does not substantially reduce transmission.**
Those are not equivalent propositions.
And the new study does not make them equivalent.
The strongest criticism one can make of public-health messaging is that it should avoid absolute language suggesting that vaccination makes transmission impossible. That's a fair demand for scientific precision.
But replacing an occasional-transmission caveat with the implication that vaccination therefore fails as a transmission-control measure is not scientific precision. It is another form of oversimplification.
The new study gives us a useful refinement of our understanding of measles transmission.
It does not overturn the basic epidemiology of measles vaccination.
I have been saying this for 40+ years. The vaccine is exactly how I got the measles at 13.
You notice they always talk about the strain of a disease, like Ebola or Convid, but they never talk about the strain of measles anymore and this is why! It is the same damn strain as the vaxx!!
The measles vaxx has already killed 3 people in 2026; 2 kids both 1 yr olds ( the boy had a heart attack at ONE!!!) and a 76 yr old lady who got it in her lungs. There are NO deaths from measles 2026.
1 Any LIVE virus vaccine can easily spread - especially if given to someone who may already be coming down with something or may have a deficient immune system. Many people don't know when they are kids if they have something like RA, Lupus, ect if big symptoms have not shown up yet.
2 Leaky vaccines spread.
Never trust people with your health, who get richer, the more sick you are. The allopathic medical community does not make money from healthy people. Neither does big pHarma. Always look at package inserts before allowing injections, study all possible side effects of any medication.
Non sequitur. “Two-dose measles vaccination programs with high coverage have enabled many countries to eliminate measles, with elimination defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a lack of endemic transmission in a jurisdiction for ≥1 year, in the presence of high-quality measles surveillance [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. By 2023, 44% of countries (84/193) had verified measles elimination [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. As time passes since elimination, the proportion of the population solely protected through”
Well golly gee! I’ll be damned. You tell the whole world one thing and then under your breath, you admit the whole thing is one big con job. Who’s responsible? Time to fess up.
The paper doesn’t conclude that. At all. Did you read it?
“Two-dose measles vaccination programs with high coverage have enabled many countries to eliminate measles, with elimination defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a lack of endemic transmission in a jurisdiction for ≥1 year, in the presence of high-quality measles surveillance [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. By 2023, 44% of countries (84/193) had verified measles elimination [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. As time passes since elimination, the proportion of the population solely protected through”
Contagion for any virus has never been proven. Let's look through the weeds. You get an injection like MMR and soon afterwards you get a reaction. For sure you do because your body is trying to deal with a new set of toxic poisons from the vaccines. Measles, chicky pox, mumps...all a reaction to a toxic event. That has never been studied because that might shatter the vaccine dome of doom.
Who is one of the biggest sponsors for Basic/academic morbillivirus research? (Measles is from the morbillivirus family) . For the largest coordinated programme with a clear eradication goal, FAO (with WOAH) (World Organisation for Animal Health) is the central coordinating body), and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation was the largest single private funder of the PPR ('peste des petits ruminants' = measles) eradication infrastructure.
If viruses do not exist - we don't know yet for sure - then there are people that do something with little things that 'shed' and which make many of us chronically ill.
Another interesting paper:
"Measles vaccination: Threat from related veterinary viruses"
'As found by phlylogenetic studies, MV shares closest similarity with the now eradicated RPV.2,3 This, along with examples of successful cross-species transmission in other RNA viruses, such as Influenza4 and the SARS and MERS Coronaviruses,5 highlights the potential risk and possible consequences of cross-species infection and the case for continued MV vaccination or alternatively use of more efficacious specifically designed vaccines.'
We've known this for a while, but definitely good to bring it back up. I've always told people who talk about "eliminating" a disease with an attenuated but live vaccine, that it isn't possible because of the fact that the vaccine is live.
Same discussion goes for Chicken pox, but even moreso, you can't eradicate it because it lives in most of us.
Fantastic Article Sayer! - I have known about this MMR shedding for many years due to a personal and tragic experience. I was a social worker who made home visits. I visited a child who had recently been given the MMR shot. She promptly developed measles symptoms and was quite ill when I saw her. At the time I thought nothing of it and I spent over an hour with her in close quarters. Two weeks later I came down with a fever and huge rash. - In addition, I didn't I know it at the time, but I was also newly pregnant. When my OBGYN saw my rash, she panicked and tested me for measles exposure. A blood test confirmed that I HAD been exposed to vaccine strain measles (very likely from the child I had visited). This exposure to vaccine strain measles caused me to lose the pregnancy because the baby had hydrocephalus (a documented fatal issue to fetuses who's mothers are exposed to measles in early pregnancy). It was an extremely tragic loss for me. At the time, all my doctors openly admitted that it WAS NOT UNCOMMON for measles to be transmitted from those given the MMR shot to others who were vaccinated or not. Now-a-days, no doctor would be allowed to admit that the MMR vaccine sheds. But at the time of my experience, doctors had not yet been bullied into silence on this issue.
Wow, thank you for sharing this illuminating, and sad story. I'm very sorry for your loss.
Too bad the study reaffirms the value of measles vax. “Two-dose measles vaccination programs with high coverage have enabled many countries to eliminate measles, with elimination defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a lack of endemic transmission in a jurisdiction for ≥1 year, in the presence of high-quality measles surveillance [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. By 2023, 44% of countries (84/193) had verified measles elimination [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. As time passes since elimination, the proportion of the population solely protected through”
did anyone here actually read it??
Too bad you read tainted studies by self-interested funders, who stands to profit from this being true. Too bad you haven't heard of natural immunity.
You just showed me that you didn’t read the study that this post is about. You didn’t read it did you? Did you? Yes or no?
Are you joking? I’m referring to the study being discussed in this very post. So you’re saying Sr Sayer Li here endorses tainted studies. Make it make sense
No joke. The vast majority of studies being discussed in any posts will come from the same biased sources. As such, I take them with a giant grain of salt. Now, tell me, since you read the study... how was the 44% eradication verified to be eliminated? Who set the parameters, and how did they verify them?
I am so sorry for your experience. <3
30 years ago, my daughter got the MMR. She developed a rash and had a low grade fever… (measles)… she promptly gave it to my almost 70 year old mother, who got a very light rash, and fever. Both were over it fairly quickly…
These so-called “experts” are at the very best incompetent, but at the worst are showing absolute maleficence.
I would pick the maleficent side…😡🔥🔥🔥
My grandson got a long 104-degree temperature & ASD from his forced [at-gun point] MMR vax, from our 62 billion in fraud fines and leader in cause of * death medicine! (* See Dr. Null' et-al well documented book Death by Medicine!) Claiming 800,000 medicines caused deaths a year, or 24 million in the last 30 years! Nothing to worry about there, right? [Note: I only lost my Dad, Wife, & best friend to iatrogenic "medicine!"
Sorry. I've lost many family members, associates and friends to "modern" medicine. As many or more that could have been lost in another time period on earth. I can't fathom how anyone would put one ounce of trust in a system that has murdered millions, perhaps billions of people since it's inception
I am so sorry for your losses Mr. Steve. I just lifted you up in prayer.
“For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.”
Romans 8:38-39 ESV
https://bible.com/bible/59/rom.8.38-39.ESV
🙏🏽✝️🙏🏽
The study directly disproves this experience as a predominant trend.
Todays, systematic review found vaccinated transmitters 'shed' measles, too. I believe many knew this years ago. Covid 19 was not the only vax that 'shed.' The human race would have been far healthier, if vaccines had not been invented Childhood diseases.were dropping, in the 1950s, because of sanitation and better nutrition, before the big Vax promotion started. . Guess who took credit for the drop? Enterprising vaccine manufacturers. By the 1980s, they were facing a slew of multi-million dollar lawsuits for 'deadly and defective vaccines.' The vax manufacturers went to their 'buddies' in congress and told them they would no longer be in business, because of ll the lawsuits. Congress gave them a gift...The National childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which removed all their liability for injuries and deaths.. There was a condition, which was never kept. Every two years, the vaccines were to be tested by a Third Party not connected to the vaccine industry. Vaccines would never have passed a valid test. Legitimate testing would have shown that ''vaccines were not safe & effective.' This would have ended this heinous National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 that our own congress ignorantly created. Instead, congress did free advertising and promotion for the vax industry by making it mandatory for school children to get vaccines in order to attend school. The Vax Industry has contributed greatly in lowering the health of the American people. We used to be #1 in World health. Now we are in 47th Place. Contact your representatives. Tell them to Rescind The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 and make the vaccine industry pay for the damage they have done...not the American taxpayers.
Thanks for spelling this out for people who have never heard it. Shameful Congress. Best reps money can buy.
You said it! The vax industry would never have been as rich and powerful, if our money-worshipping congress had not given it this Act. Lobbyists should never have been permitted in Washington, D.C. bribing our congressmen..
Cutter Laboratories' polio vaccine killed many children and gave polio to thousands! All just part of doing big money business!
No doubt here that liquefied diseases are in the vials.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS or the Department), in support of the Task Force on Safer Childhood Vaccines and in furtherance of the Executive Order of August 10, 2026, “Delivering Gold Standard Childhood Vaccine Recommendations for Americans,” seeks public comment on whether the categories currently used in Federal vaccine recommendations are adequate. Those categories are routine (universal) recommendations, risk-based recommendations, and recommendations based on shared clinical decision-making, also referred to as individual-based decision-making. The Department seeks comment on these categories and whether additional or different categories should be adopted. The Department further seeks comment on the considerations that should be relied upon in setting vaccine recommendations, including the availability and strength of available scientific evidence, the appropriate approach when randomized controlled trial evidence is limited or absent, a presumption in favor of individual autonomy and religious freedom, the downstream legal and programmatic consequences of category assignment, and the communication practices necessary to earn and maintain public trust.
To be assured consideration, comments must be received no later than September 20, 2026.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/24/2026-17250/request-for-information-categories-used-in-federal-vaccine-recommendations-and-the-role-of-shared#open-
I added my 2 cents...and I am sure that it wasn't particularly wanted. The focus on money and industry will destroy America. It has gone downhill greatly in the last 75 years...and if this continues...we will be no more.
False. Stop spreading misinformation. The very paper in question goes against your conclusion “Two-dose measles vaccination programs with high coverage have enabled many countries to eliminate measles, with elimination defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a lack of endemic transmission in a jurisdiction for ≥1 year, in the presence of high-quality measles surveillance [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. By 2023, 44% of countries (84/193) had verified measles elimination [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. As time passes since elimination, the proportion of the population solely protected through”
Sorry, I don't understand where you are coming from...What misinformation did I spread? I simply said that I added my two cents to a document requiring comments!
Sad indeed.
Amazing how we're constantly lied to about things that will make life better. When it was planned all along to destroy our lives and health.
And Fauci confessed the same. Fauci admitted in the Annals of Internal Medicine Journal that injected vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission.
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M21-0111
"Administration of parenterally administered vaccines alone typically does not result in potent mucosal immunity that might interrupt infection or transmission (9)."
No one ever claimed it was 100%. The study the dr posted shows how the vaccine still works very well and is necessary to eliminate measles.
It fails a 100% in preventing infection or transmission.
Even kids know wounds must be kept clean and infection avoided. It takes insane doctors to purposely create a wound using a needle, damage nerves and then pump a live virus into the wound. That too a virus that has been engineered using gain-of-function work to infect nerves via CD46.
"eliminate measles"
We depend on natural measles infection for good health. "Public health" is too stupid to understand the root cause, big picture of ANYTHING. So their "solutions" are worse than the "problems". We are making measles endemic as nature meant it to be.
https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/two-texas-children-did-not-die-of
Did you seriously link me to an article that tries to pretend that 2ndary infections aren’t a known risk of measles? Dude….
"2ndary infections" are iatrogenic. The best time to be exposed/infected with measles is as an infant while protected by passive maternal immunity. Measles is so mild then, it cannot even be diagnosed. No secondary infections. "Public health" created all this nonsense with their quackccines.
You never cited a source for 100% failure rate. Please post it?
Injected vaccines cannot provide mucosal immunity.
To prevent respiratory infections, you need mucosal immunity.
So injected vaccines = 100% failure rate for respiratory virus exposure.
Your failed "experts" will look at only symptomatic infections when it suits them. To cheat and lie.
This demonstrates an ever lack of historical knowledge of how bad measles and small pox actually got. And guess what, mRNA vaccines can be passed onto kids through breast milk, meaning they have “natural“ immunity
Arrant nonsense. We are all descendants of those who survived small pox and measles. We don't need any help from "public health".
"mRNA vaccines can be passed onto kids through breast milk"
That maims and kills the kids too. Not just the mother.
Cite me your data that shows 100% failure rate of measles vaccines.
It's called an immunology textbook. Route of antigen exposure matters in immunology.
you still haven't cited any evidence that measles vaccines have 100% failure rate. Not one. Goofy as unrelated zenodo citations don't to it. Your own "research" doesn't do it. Show me a third party URL.
You’re saying an immunology textbook would tell me that measles vax has 100% failure rate?
Doubt. Prove it. Show me a citation, a url I can actually confirm, not just saying stuff and waving it away
Nonsense. An immunology textbook tells you don't do insane stuff like injecting alien proteins into humans. So ALL injected vaccines are INSANITY.
Do you know the meaning of the word ANAPHYLAXIS? It means OPPOSITE OF PROTECTION. Nobel Laureate Richet taught you in 1913 that INJECTING ALIEN PROTEINS not only fails to protect, IT IS THE OPPOSITE OF PROTECTION, it makes it worse.
https://zenodo.org/records/15844676
I notice you cannot cite a single immunology textbook proving your claim. You just repeat yourself. What are you selling?
You can say that but you’re also commenting on a thread about a study that literally shows you’re wrong lol
If the clowns who authored the "study" understood any immunology,
(a) they would not be insanely injecting such garbage into people.
(b) performing a "study" about their insane action (a).
That’s straight up nonsensical and devoid of any evidence whatsoever. Just wild conjecture
They teach you in medical school that injecting egg protein into guinea pigs causes the development of deadly allergy/asthma. You REGULARLY inject egg proteins (flu shots) and 1000s of other alien proteins into humans.
UC Irvine,School of Medicine,Immunology notes:
https://pdfcoffee.com/notes-of-immunology-pdf-free.html
pg. 157
Most doctors are insane.
Take it to Dr Sayer who is endorsing the study as evidence of anything anti vax even though he clearly is misrepresenting it
There is no shortage of targets in "public health's" web of lies. He is targeting one, I am targeting another.
Isn't this what they want to spread disease and poison? People who are vaccinated should where a badge saying "I have just been vaccinated" so we know to stay clear of them.
A pharmacist told me about a month ago that it was time for my shingles and pneumonia shots. I only went to the pharmacy to pick up NSAIDS I was prescribed, which I didn't ask for nor take. When I went to foot doctors in May and June of this year. All I wanted was medical documentation to qualify me for FMLA. My foot pain qualifies me for it. As for the pharmacist I told him I didn't take vaccines. Flue, pneumonia or shingles are the least of my concerns.
Yep they want their bonus money, that is why they keep offering the poison.
Last time I checked 51,500 people need to be jabbed to "save" one life.
Used the ARR and the IFR
Data from Metric and the WHO.
And for that amount of jabbs there were 2.57 deaths reported to VAERS.
×30 to adjust for the underreporting.
And that's not counting all the other negative effects either, and deaths never attributed to the vaccine and which would never be reported even if all cases were reported.
I highly doubt your “checking” was very thorough
Thank you for sharing this information! With two of my children having immediate severe adverse events which left permanent neuro damage (causation - not just correlation!) - one son at 3 months old with the old DTP (before attenuation) and the other son at 15 months old from his MMR, I am not a fan of vaccines. I'm also not a scientist and not able to investigate what is truly valid and reliable scientific research, as well as vaccine theory. From what I currently understand, there is little validity and reliability in much of medical science. And now that I have experienced and understand more than I did when I was totally clueless when my now adult children were babies, as to the dangers of vaccines 37 and 42 years ago, I share my experience with many new parents so that they can at least make an informed decision regarding their babies. If I can spare any parent from the heartbreaking experiences my family has endured, I do so. I have communicated with many families who have experienced similarly to us. The increase in learning disabilities, developmental delays and the number of children now receiving Special Ed services is astonishing compared to the 1950's-1960's. Neuro-divergency has become the norm. When I was in elementary school, we had one child out of all 3 of our 3rd grade classrooms, who had a reputation for being what the teacher called "a character". He displayed hyperactivity: wouldn't/couldn't stay in his seat, impulsive with cracking jokes aloud and interrupting, emotion regulation problems - perhaps he'd be labeled ADHD today and probably medicated with toxic drugs. We had one overweight boy and one overweight girl out of ALL our classrooms from K through the 6th grade- and there were three 6th grade classrooms of about 30 children each when the school nurse weighed all 6th graders in the gym at the same time. We sat on the floor and the nurse, recorder and a scale stood at the front of the room. Everyone could hear the nurse pronounce the weight to the recorder. I felt badly for the only two kids who were overweight out of about 90 6th graders. Both appeared humiliated at the pronouncement of their weight. Terrible practice! In 4th-6th there was only one girl who seemed intellectually challenged far below the norm compared to the rest of us. We had one child, also K-6th, who was what was called a "juvenile delinquent": naughty, engaged in thievery, fights, property damage, "played hooky." Unfortunately, he ended up in a 1965 juvenile hall at only 12 or 13 years old. (He probably went on to become a successful day-trader. JK JK) If we had any autistic children, we didn't realize it or they were elsewhere in special programs or institutions. We had one girl who was a thalidomide baby; and, she was missing both legs and one arm and used prostheses and ambulated remarkably well. Her name was Mickey and she was very kind, good natured and had a smile that lit up the room! To what degree vaccines, drugs, environmental toxins, unhealthy foods, water and depleted soils have contributed to the myriad health problems of children (and adults) today is difficult to measure. All I know is my peers and I received only two vaccinations during childhood, smallpox and oral polio - and maybe a sole tetanus shot- and we spent most of our time outside playing games, ball sports of all kinds, exploring the nearby woods, riding bikes. When we got the chicken pox, friend's Mom's would actually send their child over to the sick kid's house hoping they'd "catch" it for the good of immunizing the community?? Same with measles. I also do not remember one kid in our Long Island school or neighborhood becoming maimed or dying from measles or chicken pox either. I have a steel trap memory for details, too. Not one child in our school developed polio from the oral polio vaccine administered by the school lunch cashier! I remember that day like it was yesterday. Perhaps, the oral polio was "safe and effective?" I don't know.... (And to confuse matters...My Mom spent a year in a hospital in Brooklyn at age 11-12, much of the time confined to a wheelchair due to polio. One leg ended up about 3/8" shorter than the other but she went on to have a Yoga School and was a yoga and aerobics dance instructor for 30 years. Needless to say, she thought it was great the school gave us the oral polio vaccine during lunch time. ) Deceptions abound; greed and lust for power and bad intentions are rampant on this planet; and, each of us needs to develop excellent discernment, critical thinking skills, and not lose heart or common sense. We must be willing to think and perceive outside our own narrow limited paradigms, especially amidst the technological trajectory we're on in this Information Age, so that we can combat the many malevolent forces and voices working upon us. I'm grateful for the work Sayer Ji and others do to investigate and attempt to discover what is true.
### Yes, Vaccinated People Can Spread Measles. That Is Not What This Study Shows.
Sayer Ji's article is built around a legitimate finding, but it draws a much larger conclusion from that finding than the underlying evidence supports.
The new systematic review by Wright et al. is worth discussing. It found that vaccinated people who nevertheless developed measles can, in some circumstances, transmit the virus to other people. Across the reports included in the review, 70 of 890 vaccinated measles cases were documented as transmitting measles, producing 237 direct secondary cases. That finding is real. It is also not particularly surprising: measles vaccination is highly effective, but it does not create an absolute biological guarantee that a vaccinated person can never become infected or transmit virus.
The problem begins when that finding is converted into the much broader claim that vaccination therefore does not substantially prevent measles transmission.
**The study did not demonstrate that.**
In fact, the authors explicitly caution against making that comparison. Their review specifically selected reports in which transmission from vaccinated cases had been documented. Consequently, the 70/890 figure cannot be interpreted as the percentage of all vaccinated people who develop measles who will transmit it under ordinary circumstances. It is a figure from a selected collection of outbreak investigations.
That distinction matters enormously.
If investigators deliberately collect cases in which an unusual event occurred, the frequency of that event in the selected dataset cannot automatically be generalized to the underlying population.
The headline number — **7.9%** — therefore needs a very large asterisk.
It does **not** mean:
> 7.9% of vaccinated people transmit measles.
It does **not** mean:
> 7.9% of vaccinated people who get measles transmit measles in the general population.
And it certainly does not mean:
> vaccination fails to prevent measles transmission in 92.1% of cases.
It means that 70 of the 890 vaccinated measles cases represented in these selected reports were documented as transmitters.
Those are very different propositions.
### The more important question is missing
The scientifically important comparison is not:
**Can a vaccinated person transmit measles?**
The answer is clearly yes.
The important question is:
**How efficiently does a vaccinated person with breakthrough measles transmit compared with an unvaccinated person with measles?**
The Wright review was not designed to answer that question.
And that omission matters because other research has specifically examined transmission following vaccination failure.
A 2024 systematic review of onward transmission after secondary vaccine failure identified 109 measles cases associated with secondary vaccine failure. Eleven of those cases transmitted measles, producing 23 onward infections. The investigators estimated an effective reproduction number of only **0.063** (95% CI 0–0.5). They concluded that the risk of onward transmission from people experiencing secondary vaccine failure was **very low**, although not zero.
That is a dramatically different epidemiological picture from suggesting that breakthrough cases transmit measles in anything approaching the same way as susceptible, unvaccinated cases.
And it makes biological sense.
Vaccination does not have to provide sterilizing immunity in 100% of recipients to reduce transmission. Partial or waning immunity can still reduce viral replication, alter the clinical presentation, reduce viral burden, shorten infectiousness, and substantially reduce the probability of infecting someone else.
The 2024 review specifically notes that measles following secondary vaccine failure is generally milder and associated with lower viral loads.
So the existence of breakthrough transmission is not evidence against a substantial reduction in transmission.
### The “31% had two doses” argument is also being overinterpreted
The review found that 22 of the 70 documented vaccinated transmitters had received at least two doses.
That is 31%.
But what does that number actually tell us?
Very little about the effectiveness of two doses.
The denominator is **70 documented vaccinated transmitters**, not all people who received two doses and subsequently encountered measles.
It therefore cannot establish that 31% of fully vaccinated people transmit measles.
It cannot establish that two-dose vaccination provides little protection against transmission.
And it certainly cannot establish that the second dose is somehow responsible for transmission.
Indeed, the original implication that the second dose itself was the problematic dose was subsequently corrected. That correction was appropriate because the data simply cannot support that inference.
### The vaccine-strain speculation goes even further beyond the evidence
The article also raises the possibility that some of the transmission attributed to vaccinated people might involve vaccine-strain virus.
This is a reasonable scientific question to investigate.
It is not evidence that vaccine-strain virus caused any of these documented transmission chains.
Those are two entirely different things.
The review itself does not establish that the 70 vaccinated transmitters were transmitting vaccine-strain measles virus. The existence of vaccine-virus RNA or vaccine-associated viral replication does not establish person-to-person transmission of vaccine-strain virus.
If someone wants to argue that vaccine-strain transmission explains some of these cases, the burden is straightforward: demonstrate it through appropriate viral sequencing and epidemiologic linkage.
Until then, it is speculation.
### What the study actually tells us
The most defensible interpretation of the new paper is considerably less dramatic:
**Breakthrough measles can occasionally be transmitted by vaccinated individuals, and outbreak investigators should not assume that a vaccinated measles case is incapable of transmitting the virus.**
That is useful information.
It may change how individual outbreaks are investigated.
It does not overturn the much larger body of evidence showing that measles vaccination substantially reduces infection and transmission.
There is an important difference between saying:
> “Vaccinated people can sometimes transmit measles.”
and saying:
> “Vaccination does not prevent measles transmission.”
The first statement is supported.
The second does not follow.
### Look at what is actually happening during the current resurgence
There is also a straightforward reality check available in the current U.S. outbreak data.
As of September 3, 2026, CDC reports **3,134 confirmed U.S. measles cases** for 2026, with **95% outbreak-associated**.
Current surveillance also shows that the overwhelming majority of reported cases occur in people who are unvaccinated or whose vaccination status is unknown. A recent national summary reported approximately **93% of 2026 cases** in that category.
That doesn't prove that vaccinated people never transmit measles. They clearly can.
It does, however, put the Wright paper into its proper epidemiological context.
If vaccinated breakthrough cases were the major engine of measles transmission, we would expect the epidemiologic pattern to look very different.
Instead, the current resurgence is occurring in the setting of immunity gaps, with outbreaks disproportionately involving people who are unvaccinated or whose vaccination status is unknown.
That is entirely compatible with a vaccine that is highly effective but not perfect.
### The real scientific lesson is more nuanced
There is no contradiction in all of the following statements being true simultaneously:
1. Two-dose measles vaccination is highly effective at preventing measles.
2. A small proportion of vaccinated people can nevertheless develop breakthrough infection.
3. Some of those breakthrough cases can transmit measles.
4. Breakthrough transmission is not zero.
5. Breakthrough cases generally transmit much less efficiently than susceptible unvaccinated cases.
6. Vaccination therefore substantially reduces, but does not mathematically eliminate, the possibility of transmission.
That is what the evidence actually supports.
The mistake in Ji's article is not pointing out that breakthrough transmission exists.
**The mistake is treating proof that transmission is possible as proof that vaccination does not substantially reduce transmission.**
Those are not equivalent propositions.
And the new study does not make them equivalent.
The strongest criticism one can make of public-health messaging is that it should avoid absolute language suggesting that vaccination makes transmission impossible. That's a fair demand for scientific precision.
But replacing an occasional-transmission caveat with the implication that vaccination therefore fails as a transmission-control measure is not scientific precision. It is another form of oversimplification.
The new study gives us a useful refinement of our understanding of measles transmission.
It does not overturn the basic epidemiology of measles vaccination.
Sadly, the psychology of the anti science crowd here reflects very much that of cults
I have been saying this for 40+ years. The vaccine is exactly how I got the measles at 13.
You notice they always talk about the strain of a disease, like Ebola or Convid, but they never talk about the strain of measles anymore and this is why! It is the same damn strain as the vaxx!!
The measles vaxx has already killed 3 people in 2026; 2 kids both 1 yr olds ( the boy had a heart attack at ONE!!!) and a 76 yr old lady who got it in her lungs. There are NO deaths from measles 2026.
1 Any LIVE virus vaccine can easily spread - especially if given to someone who may already be coming down with something or may have a deficient immune system. Many people don't know when they are kids if they have something like RA, Lupus, ect if big symptoms have not shown up yet.
2 Leaky vaccines spread.
Never trust people with your health, who get richer, the more sick you are. The allopathic medical community does not make money from healthy people. Neither does big pHarma. Always look at package inserts before allowing injections, study all possible side effects of any medication.
That's not what the paper found. Way to butcher statistics.
Is that the same as butchering 65 million human babies, that sick people just love?
Non sequitur. “Two-dose measles vaccination programs with high coverage have enabled many countries to eliminate measles, with elimination defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a lack of endemic transmission in a jurisdiction for ≥1 year, in the presence of high-quality measles surveillance [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. By 2023, 44% of countries (84/193) had verified measles elimination [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. As time passes since elimination, the proportion of the population solely protected through”
Well golly gee! I’ll be damned. You tell the whole world one thing and then under your breath, you admit the whole thing is one big con job. Who’s responsible? Time to fess up.
The paper doesn’t conclude that. At all. Did you read it?
“Two-dose measles vaccination programs with high coverage have enabled many countries to eliminate measles, with elimination defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a lack of endemic transmission in a jurisdiction for ≥1 year, in the presence of high-quality measles surveillance [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. By 2023, 44% of countries (84/193) had verified measles elimination [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2026.2708188#]. As time passes since elimination, the proportion of the population solely protected through”
Contagion for any virus has never been proven. Let's look through the weeds. You get an injection like MMR and soon afterwards you get a reaction. For sure you do because your body is trying to deal with a new set of toxic poisons from the vaccines. Measles, chicky pox, mumps...all a reaction to a toxic event. That has never been studied because that might shatter the vaccine dome of doom.
Who is one of the biggest sponsors for Basic/academic morbillivirus research? (Measles is from the morbillivirus family) . For the largest coordinated programme with a clear eradication goal, FAO (with WOAH) (World Organisation for Animal Health) is the central coordinating body), and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation was the largest single private funder of the PPR ('peste des petits ruminants' = measles) eradication infrastructure.
If viruses do not exist - we don't know yet for sure - then there are people that do something with little things that 'shed' and which make many of us chronically ill.
Another interesting paper:
"Measles vaccination: Threat from related veterinary viruses"
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5791572/
'As found by phlylogenetic studies, MV shares closest similarity with the now eradicated RPV.2,3 This, along with examples of successful cross-species transmission in other RNA viruses, such as Influenza4 and the SARS and MERS Coronaviruses,5 highlights the potential risk and possible consequences of cross-species infection and the case for continued MV vaccination or alternatively use of more efficacious specifically designed vaccines.'
We've known this for a while, but definitely good to bring it back up. I've always told people who talk about "eliminating" a disease with an attenuated but live vaccine, that it isn't possible because of the fact that the vaccine is live.
Same discussion goes for Chicken pox, but even moreso, you can't eradicate it because it lives in most of us.
Wow Sending gratitude with hugs.
Cowan etc. say there’s no such thing as contagion so this must be a psy-op or something right?
But people detox from toxins. And perhaps also signal each other to detox
“Signal”? How does that work?