14 Comments
User's avatar
denise ward's avatar

No harm can even get close to the harm governments perform. What it is really is they don't want us talking, sharing ideas, learning more stuff about "them". Typical fascists. But we must keep talking. Right now talking is the thing to do. I notice that there is more talk about Israel today than there was say 5 years ago where one was pilloried for speaking against Israel. The more talk we do, the more holes in the dyke that they need fingers for to stop the deluge.

Tom's avatar

Israel is being privatized. Mission accomplished, its days of being the Wall Street owned, US military's plausible denial are almost over. Kissinger, a few years ago, even said Israel wouldn't last another 10 years, Israelis are jumping ship. So it is ok to point out they did what they did, and don't look at the Oligarchy.

This article briefly talks about limiting AI worldwide. That, of course, is to limit us, not the corporatocracy. Can you see laws against having too good a home unit? Which will be needed to function in the social-credit domain? Would like to hear comments about what all this really means, I am just speculating.

april's avatar

This is my question - what's the end goal in addition to fear mongering as a method of control?

Jenny Stewart's avatar

They'd best ask King Canute that question!!

Jacqueline S Anderson's avatar

Sometimes what we 'go through' serves as the sustenance for our perseverance. Thank you again Sayer for your persistence and dedication to connect the dots and to share.

Helen's avatar

This is a really complicated read for me. I will need to re-read several times to fully understand what is happening re AI, as I don't know the players or end goals. All I know is the CCDH put you and others I respected and wanted to listen to on the Disinformation Dozen list and I assumed they did so as they were backed by the vaccine makers/sellers/benefiters, and the people they named were a significant real (not potential) threat to their sales/profits. So now I need to understand what exactly is happening with AI. I will try to get educated.

DEANNA's avatar

YOU MY FRIEND ARE A GENIUS !! grateful you are alive in our current reality

Debbie Lerman's avatar

Great info and research! But I would caution against your partisan interpretation of who’s behind the CCDH and the tri-partite psyop.

It is almost certainly NOT “the Democrats” who are doing these things for partisan reasons and positioning the story this way either intentionally or unintentionally runs cover for the nonpartisan banking-military-intelligence-corporate-NGO cabal that is running the show. CCHD was an intelligence (both British and US) narrative control/signature reduction operation from the moment of its formation and almost certainly through the most recent transformation that you document.

Anthony Zappia's avatar

Shouldn't AI be regulated? Do we really want to see Super AI developed? I'm missing something here for sure, but why is CCDH so interested in regulating AI ?

Sayer Ji's avatar

AI regulation is all about control and centralization. There are independent LLMs (basis for AI) that would be completely eliminated if certain legislation or executive orders go through. This is the same existential battle for narrative control happening, but it has moved from the web to LLMs/AI systems. So, yes, AI can be dangerous. But so can regulating away all but the systems they control and can deploy without We the People's involvement.

Anthony Zappia's avatar

Yes, and in controlling it, they can slant what it does and doesn't do. Thank you Sayer.

Tom's avatar

Mike Adams today at natural news.com writes about new Chinese Deepseek models crushing US AI company offerings. Faster, cheaper, less power required, free downloads, Open Source. uncensored, and superior to US models, which are collaboratively engaged in a dumbing down process of censorship. I wonder how they reported 911 today, lol. He expects US AI companies to be wrecked by this, as their financial assumptions of captive customers will evaporate. Hence the US seeking "international coooperation" . Look for nasty sanctions, military action, etc. to move in this direction.

Maybe's avatar

Because everything is binary. Which proposed US or EU or UK legislation "would completely eliminate independent LLMs," or anything close?

A.J.'s avatar

Here we are during America250 and once again enough of us must rise and become “rebels” to quash the ever present self-appointed wannabe aristocrat “betters” to fight for our inalienable human rights such as for Free Press and freedoms of speech, religion, assembly and private property. To be free of those who seek to be tyrants dictating our daily lives, stomping on our liberty and pursuit of happiness. Instead of rule by 1700s private

London men’s clubs and investment deals enabled by London’s parliament for quiet insiders’ investment deals with a bankrupt token king serving his powers-that-be from the Penn family with a royal charter granting them perpetual freedom from taxes in Pennsylvania (for having bailed James 2 out of bankruptcy) to the trade monopoly charters granted to the British East and West Indies companies, today we get those same Transatlantic wannabe “betters” sliming around trying once again, now often via NGO “fronts,” trying once again to make us their “royal” peasants who must doff their caps, never talk back, but only say, “Yes, sir!”

My early childhood lessons on the importance of Free Speech and who truly controls big money spinner industries and mobs, too: https://ajvalleyheartsdelight.substack.com/p/mr-hoffer-free-speech-and-the-pursuit