On June 28, 2022, Sesame Street posted a 60-second video to its YouTube channel titled “Elmo Gets the COVID-19 Vaccine | PSA.”

It’s a well-made piece of persuasion. Elmo, who has been three and a half years old since 1984, shows off his “super duper” bandage. There “was a little pinch. But it was okay.” Then his father, Louie, looks into the camera and speaks to every hesitant parent in America:

“I had a lot of questions about Elmo getting the COVID vaccine. Was it safe? Was it the right decision?”

Eleven seconds later, the doubt has been resolved for you:

“I learned that Elmo getting vaccinated is the best way to keep himself, our friends, neighbors and everyone else healthy and enjoying the things they love.”

A hug follows. Then an announcer: “It’s okay to have questions about COVID vaccines for your kids.”

That’s the move worth studying. The ad takes the parent’s instinct to ask questions, gives it to a beloved puppet, and answers it before the parent has a chance to. It presents doubt so it can close it down.

This was not a whimsical one-off from a children’s television workshop. It was one output of what its own organizers called the largest communications program in our nation’s history, built with federal public-health agencies, a major medical trade association, and tens of millions of corporate dollars.

Four years later, Pfizer-BioNTech’s product is no longer authorized for children ages six months through four years. Federal guidance and product labeling have also narrowed which pediatric uses are on-label, a shift sharply at odds with the PSA’s broad, categorical reassurance. Nobody made a puppet video about that.

This is the story of who built the campaign, what it cost, and what came after.

Part I: Who Was Behind It

Sesame Workshop’s own press release is candid about who was in the room. The PSA was released “in collaboration with the Ad Council and COVID Collaborative’s COVID-19 Vaccine Education Initiative,” and it was “produced in partnership with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).”

Five institutions. Each one deserves a name and a face.

Sesame Workshop

The nonprofit behind Sesame Street produced and released the spot. Its campaign lead was Dr. Jeanette Betancourt, Senior Vice President of US Social Impact. Its president at the time, Sherrie Westin, was named CEO in July 2024.

The clearest statement of what Sesame thought it was offering came from its own chief marketing officer. Launching an earlier round of vaccine PSAs, Samantha Maltin, EVP and CMO, said the goal was to:

“…harness the power of Sesame Workshop and the reach of the Ad Council…”

Harness the power. The asset being put to use was fifty years of trust that parents and children have placed in these characters.

The Ad Council

The Ad Council turns corporate media budgets into “public service” messaging. Its president and CEO, Lisa Sherman, was the campaign’s public face. On the Elmo spot:

“It’s important that parents feel informed and confident about what the COVID-19 vaccines mean for their families, and we are proud to work with our partners, medical experts – and of course Elmo – to spread that message.”

She also named the urgency: this was “an important decision many need to make in advance of the upcoming school season.”

COVID Collaborative

The COVID Collaborative is a bipartisan assembly of former officials, and it convened the vaccine education initiative with the Ad Council. Its CEO is John Bridgeland, former Director of the White House Domestic Policy Council. Its president is Gary Edson, and its co-chairs are former Idaho Gov. and Sen. Dirk Kempthorne (R) and former Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick (D). The Collaborative is a project of UNITE, chaired by Tim Shriver.

The CDC

The CDC was a named production partner, and it wasn’t a passive one. According to the campaign’s organizers, the CDC provided scientific guidance on all aspects of the campaign, and its brand appeared on select creative assets.

The American Academy of Pediatrics

The AAP, the pediatricians’ professional association, was the other named production partner. Its president in 2022 was Dr. Moira Szilagyi. Looking back later, she said: “Somewhere what got lost in our country, I think, was what a miracle these vaccines were.”

Keep the AAP in mind. It comes back in Part IV.

Part II: Follow the Money

The Elmo spot was built on a large funding structure, and its size helps explain how thoroughly this message saturated American media.

The corporate fund. On November 23, 2020, before any vaccine was authorized, the Ad Council announced a $50 million fund for the COVID-19 Vaccine Education Initiative, created with the COVID Collaborative. By February 2021 it had exceeded that goal.

The COVID Collaborative reports more than $52 million raised. The leading contributors it names are Amazon, Apple, Bank of America, Cisco, CVS Health, Facebook, General Motors, Google and YouTube, the Humana Foundation, NBCUniversal/Comcast, Salesforce, Verizon, Walgreens, and Walmart.

Two of those names stand out. CVS Health and Walgreens both gave the shots the campaign was promoting in their own pharmacies.

The donated media. The money was only the seed. By October 26, 2021, the initiative had surpassed its goal of $240 million in donated media and related publicity. Donors of airtime and ad inventory included Disney (ABC, ESPN, Hulu), FOX, NBCUniversal and Telemundo, ViacomCBS, WarnerMedia, Facebook and Instagram, Google and YouTube, TikTok, Snapchat, Spotify, Pinterest, LinkedIn, and The Weather Channel.

Several of the same platforms that donated airtime and advertising inventory to the vaccine-education campaign were simultaneously under public and private pressure to enforce COVID-19 misinformation rules against specifically identified individuals, including people named in CCDH’s ‘Disinformation Dozen’ report. YouTube later my channels and stated that, after review, they did not violate its Community Guidelines.

The taxpayer layer. Alongside the private effort, HHS ran its own $265 million COVID public-education campaignstarting in summer 2020. That included a $250 million NIH award to the Fors Marsh Group, which created the “We Can Do This” brand, all paid for through a $300 million interagency agreement drawing on CDC’s CARES Act funds. Under its “Vaccinate with Confidence” framework, the CDC funded more than 200 partners. Across the March 2021–December 2022 rollout, it funded 110 primary and 1,051 subrecipient partners at the national, state, and community level.

A note on accuracy. I have not found documentation that Pfizer or Moderna directly paid for the Elmo spot, and the campaign materials don’t list them as partners. Pfizer does appear as a Sesame Workshop donor in later years, in the $100,000–$249,999 band of its 2024 impact report. That’s worth knowing, but it’s a separate fact. The documented structure is damning on its own: corporate money, federal science guidance, and a medical trade association, all speaking through a puppet.

Part III: It Wasn’t One Ad

The Elmo spot was the youngest-audience edge of a sustained effort to put Sesame Street characters to work for vaccine messaging.

• November 2021: CNN and Sesame Street co-produced a family town hall, “The ABCs of COVID Vaccines.” That same month, Big Bird delivered his own pro-vaccine message to young viewers, which drew public criticism from Sen. Ted Cruz.

• June 2022: Elmo’s PSA, released days after the FDA’s emergency authorization for children as young as six months.

• Later: Sesame Workshop, the Ad Council, COVID Collaborative, and CDC launched a further series of PSAs with Elmo, Louie and other Muppets, “created in close partnership with the CDC.”

The criticism started right away. Cruz accused Sesame Street of having Elmo “aggressively advocate” for shots in young children and noted that the spot cited no scientific evidence. The comedian Russell Brand put it more sharply:

“When it starts getting into complex territory that involves the power of the state, the influence of pharmaceutical companies, the impact of coronavirus on young children — these are not issues I want resolved by members of Elmo’s family.”

The critics were dismissed as cranks at the time. Here is what the government has said since.

Part IV: The Walk-Back Nobody Advertised

There was no $240 million campaign for any of what follows. No Muppets and no hug at the end. It came out as label changes, regulatory memos, and footnotes in clinical guidance.

The cardiac warning got stronger

On June 25, 2025, the FDA required and approved expanded warnings about myocarditis and pericarditis on Pfizer’s Comirnaty and Moderna’s Spikevax. The new label estimates about 8 cases per million doses in people aged 6 months through 64 years, and about 27 per million in males aged 12 through 24, in the week after vaccination.

The most important sentence isn’t about frequency, though. It’s about what happened to the hearts afterward:

“…at a median follow-up of approximately 5 months post-vaccination, persistence of abnormal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) findings that are a marker for myocardial injury was common. The clinical and prognostic significance of these CMR findings is not known.”

Read it twice. Five months out, markers of heart-muscle injury were “common,” and the agency says their long-term significance is “not known.” This isn’t a critic’s claim. It comes from an FDA-funded, FDA-co-authored study, and it’s now printed on the label.

The spot told parents “there was a little pinch. But it was okay.” Nobody in the ad said “unknown long-term cardiac significance.”

The authorization for the youngest children was pulled

On August 27, 2025, Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID vaccine was no longer authorized for children under 5. CDC’s current clinical guidance puts it plainly: “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is no longer authorized in the United States for children ages 6 months–4 years.”

That is the age group the Elmo spot was released to reach. It went out days after emergency authorization opened the shots to children as young as six months. Four years later, one of the two products it promoted to parents of those children can’t legally be given to them.

Healthy children are now “off-label”

The broad “everyone six months and older” recommendation is gone. In May 2025, HHS dropped the routine recommendation for healthy children, and the CDC moved to what it calls shared clinical decision-making.

CDC’s current guidance, updated September 23, 2026, limits Moderna’s approval for the youngest children to those with “at least one condition that places them at increased risk for severe COVID-19.” Then it states the conclusion outright:

“Vaccination of children 5-11 years of age with any product other than Spikevax or Comirnaty and vaccination of children in this age group without high-risk conditions is off-label use.”

“Vaccination of persons 12-64 years of age without high-risk conditions is off-label use.”

In 2022, the message was that vaccinating Elmo was “the best way to keep himself, our friends, neighbors and everyone else healthy.” In 2026, the CDC’s own wording is that giving the shot to a healthy child is off-label.

The deaths question

On November 28, 2025, Dr. Vinay Prasad, then director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, sent staff a memo headed “Deaths in children due to COVID-19 vaccines and CBER’s path forward.” He wrote that career staff “have found that at least 10 children have died after and because of receiving COVID-19 vaccination,” based on an initial review of 96 child deaths reported to VAERS between 2021 and 2024.

The FDA’s formal analysis, made public in May 2026, came back more cautious. Of the 96 reports reviewed, none were classified as “certain.” Five were classified “possible” and two “probable,” mostly involving myocarditis, with an average age of 13. The agency stressed that these classifications don’t prove causation.

Media coverage framed that result as a debunking. Set the headline aside, though. The FDA’s own conservative review, using WHO causality criteria, still found seven child deaths it could not rule out as vaccine-related, and it called two of them probable.

And yet, still being promoted

This is where the irony stops being subtle.

Visit the FDA’s parent-facing page today, Vaccines for Children – A Guide for Parents and Caregivers. The COVID-19 vaccine is still listed alongside measles and polio among “the most commonly administered vaccines.” And parents are still told:

“Getting a COVID-19 vaccine is the best way to prevent COVID-19, including the potential consequences of hospitalization and death.”

That’s Louie’s line almost word for word, four years later, from the same agency whose label now carries the cardiac warning, whose authorization for under-5s was pulled, and whose own reviewers flagged seven child deaths.

The American Academy of Pediatrics, a production partner on the Elmo spot, hasn’t backed off either. As of September 2026, the AAP recommends COVID-19 vaccination for “all infants and children ages 6 months through 23 months,” and for “anyone ages 2 to 18 who isn’t at risk but whose parents or guardian wants them to get a shot.”

So we have two different postures at once. The regulator has narrowed approval, expanded the warning, and reclassified healthy-child use as off-label. The professional association that helped make the puppet ad still recommends the shot for every baby. And the FDA’s own parent guide still uses the 2022 talking points.

Part V: What They’ll Say — and Why It Doesn’t Save Them

Serious readers deserve the strongest counterargument, so here it is.

CDC’s guidance cites a retrospective cohort of more than 4 million people aged 16–25 from 2020 to 2025. It found myocarditis incidence of 0.05% after COVID illness versus 0.005% after vaccination. In other words, the infection carries a higher myocarditis risk than the shot.

That’s a legitimate data point and I’m not going to pretend it doesn’t exist. It doesn’t answer the question this piece is asking, for three reasons.

First, the comparison is an average over a population of teenagers and young adults. It says nothing about a healthy toddler with near-zero risk of severe disease. That’s the child this campaign targeted, and the child for whom the CDC now calls the shot off-label.

Second, it doesn’t address the finding printed on the label: persistent markers of heart-muscle injury at five months, of “not known” significance. The open letter discussed below says there are “no studies demonstrating prevention of hospitalization or death” in children. If that’s right, an unknown cardiac risk is being weighed against a benefit that was never shown.

Third, and most importantly, the argument here doesn’t depend on any contested injury number. It depends on an asymmetry. When the product was being promoted, it got a puppet, $50 million, a quarter-billion in donated airtime, the CDC’s logo, and the pediatricians’ endorsement. When the regulator narrowed the product, it got a label revision and a footnote. The public was sold a certainty the evidence never supported, and was never told when that certainty was withdrawn.

That isn’t public health communication. It’s a marketing campaign that never issued a correction.

Part VI: The Petition — Why I Signed

Earlier this month, 168 physicians, scientists, researchers, lawmakers, and health-freedom advocates, representing more than 63 million followers, sent an open letter to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and President Trump demanding removal of the mRNA platform. The effort was coordinated by Dr. Mary Talley Bowden. The signatories include Rep. Thomas Massie, former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Louisiana Deputy Surgeon General Dr. Sean Troxclair, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, Tucker Carlson, and others.

I’m one of them, and I want to explain why.

The letter’s first demand is to “ban mRNA/gene therapy-derived technologies for all vaccines.” That includes the products still being given to children. Its other demands are to end the PREP Act declaration and its “ironclad liability shield for manufacturers and administrators,” ask Congress to repeal the PREP Act, ban direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising, end the incentive structures that push providers toward medical coercion, and end conflicts of interest at the CDC, FDA, NIH, and NIAID.

On children specifically, the letter makes the point this whole piece has been building toward:

“Parental choice is not realistic when parents are not getting informed consent on the true risks of these products.”

It also takes on the “shared clinical decision-making” framework directly:

“By treating the decision to inject a child with mRNA as a ‘shared decision,’ while treating routine injections as the default, a dangerous legal precedent is being set that assigns powers to the federal government that have historically belonged solely to parents.”

According to the letter, more than 50 million Americans received mRNA COVID shots this year, including about 7 million children, and HHS has awarded $1.24 billion in contracts to Pfizer for future mRNA shots, “including for children.”

The Elmo spot is exactly why that line about informed consent matters. You can’t give informed consent to a hug from a puppet. A one-minute ad that turns a parent’s hesitation into a script and then answers it in eleven seconds isn’t informing anyone. It’s persuasion aimed at the people least able to push back: parents who trust Sesame Street and children who love Elmo.

The letter isn’t the only pressure. Children’s Health Defense’s citizen petition, asking the FDA to revoke the Pfizer and Moderna licenses, has been pending since December 8, 2025 and has drawn more than 104,000 public comments in support. On September 25, the Independent Medical Alliance called on the CDC to immediately withdraw its “off-label” recommendation for healthy infants, children, and adults.

HHS’s response to the open letter, through press secretary Emily Hilliard, was that Secretary Kennedy “believes mRNA products warrant heightened scientific scrutiny,” and that HHS had “wound down investments in mRNA vaccines for upper respiratory viruses because the technology does not effectively protect against infection from rapidly mutating viruses such as COVID-19 and flu.”

Think about that sentence next to the Elmo spot. The federal health department now says the technology “does not effectively protect against infection” from COVID. In 2022, a puppet told America it was “the best way to keep himself, our friends, neighbors and everyone else healthy.”

Heightened scrutiny isn’t enough. A product that federal officials now concede doesn’t reliably prevent infection, that carries a cardiac warning with unknown long-term significance, whose own regulator calls it off-label for healthy children, and whose makers are protected from liability should not be given to children at all.

Conclusion: The Correction That Never Aired

Every institution in the Elmo spot is still operating. Sesame Workshop is still making children’s programming. The Ad Council is still running “public service” campaigns. The CDC’s logo is still on its creative. The AAP still recommends the shot for every infant. The FDA’s parent guide still repeats Louie’s line.

None of them has produced a PSA that says: We told you this was the best way to protect your baby. Since then the label has been changed to warn about heart injury. The authorization for the youngest children was withdrawn. The government now calls this use off-label for healthy kids. We’re sorry we used Elmo to tell you otherwise.

That’s the one-minute spot this country is owed. Until it airs, the original belongs where I’ve put it: in the Hall of Fame of the Covid-era Mockingbird Media, as a case study in what happens when institutions that are supposed to earn a parent’s trust decide to manufacture it instead.

Watch it again. Listen for the moment Louie asks, “Was it safe?”

It was a good question. It still is. They just never let him wait for the answer.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

Sources

• Sesame Workshop, Elmo PSA press release (June 28, 2022)

• Sesame Workshop, Sesame Workshop, Ad Council, COVID Collaborative and CDC launch new PSAs

• COVID Collaborative, “It’s Up To You” Vaccine Education Campaign

• Ad Council, Our COVID-19 Vaccine Retrospective

• GAO, COVID-19: Information on HHS’s Public Education Campaign (GAO-22-104724)

• CDC, Operationalizing the Vaccinate With Confidence Framework

• CDC, Funded partners during the COVID-19 vaccination rollout

• FDA, Required updated myocarditis/pericarditis warning (June 25, 2025)

• FDA, Vaccines for Children – A Guide for Parents and Caregivers

• FDA, Prasad memo: “Deaths in children due to COVID-19 vaccines” (Nov. 28, 2025)

• CDC, 2026–2027 COVID-19 Vaccination Guidance (updated Sept. 23, 2026)

• Contemporary Pediatrics, FDA pulls clearance of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for children under 5

• Reuters, US CDC keeps COVID vaccine option for healthy children (May 30, 2025)

• NBC News, No child deaths definitively linked to Covid shots, FDA says (May 2026)

• NPR, Medical groups offer vaccine guidance to fill federal vacuum (Sept. 2, 2026)

• Focal Points, Open letter and full signatory list (Sept. 21, 2026)

• Global Research, MAHA coalition open letter to Trump and RFK Jr.

• Just the News, “You will pay a political price” (Sept. 21, 2026)

• Children’s Health Defense, Citizen Petition (FDA-2025-P-6831)

• Ground News / IMA, IMA calls on CDC to withdraw off-label recommendation (Sept. 25, 2026)

• CNN, The ABCs of COVID Vaccines town hall

• The Hill, Cruz knocks Sesame Street

• The Guardian, Ted Cruz bashes Sesame Street video

• Children’s Health Defense, Elmo Gets the Jab

• Sesame Workshop, 2024 Mid-Year Impact Report

At CHD in DC on Constitution Day, Mary Holland sat down with Andrew Wakefield, Polly Tommey, Jan Jekielek, Katherine Paul and Sayer Ji to trace how the propaganda system was assembled, pre-COVID to now: who pays for it, why it hides behind paywalls, why the Crown-era printing-press fight is happening again with AI, and why the machine is failing in real time on X.

Trust in the CDC has gone from 80 percent to 30. This panel is the story of why, told by the people who paid for it. 54 minutes. Watch it, then share it with someone who still gets their news from the outlets that ran the hit pieces.

Later that day I gave the full account from my own files, from a 2010 Gates Foundation “rumor surveillance” paper in the Epstein files to the President calling twelve of us killers. Full talk, transcript and documents: They Tried to Remove Natural Medicine from the Internet by ‘Killing its Messengers.’ I Followed the Trail to the Epstein Files.

Exposing the machine is half the job. The other half is the remedy. Twenty-four organizations have joined Restore the First to put the JAWBONE Act on the floor and get a First Amendment Remedies Act drafted. No one restores the First Amendment alone: restorethe1st.com

Leave a comment

Share

Subscribe now

Watch Thomas Massie above explain why he believes Speaker Mike Johnson shortened the House calendar to delay an Epstein vote.

In my earlier investigation, I covered Massie’s decision to read names on the House floor and his push to force a vote on the Epstein Files Transparency Act II.

Naming people is not a finding of guilt. It is a demand for investigation—and for access to the records needed to establish responsibility.

That is where this fight connects to Shadow Empire: The Epstein Files.

The documents already released demand more than a list of famous names. They demand an explanation of how the relationships worked: who proposed the projects, arranged the money, opened the doors, and made Epstein useful.

My book follows that record across banking, philanthropy, science, and state power. Its central argument is that power increasingly operates through networks that cross national borders—and that understanding Epstein means examining the machinery around him.

Massie is pressing for what remains concealed. Shadow Empire examines what the disclosed documents allow us to see.

Making records public is only the beginning. Making power visible is the work.

Watch the announcement of Shadow Empire.

Pre-Order on Amazon

Pre-Order on Barnes & Noble

Share

Subscribe now

Introducing Shadow Empire: The Epstein Files. Nearly 3.5 million pages. Thirty-four chapters. Every claim footnoted to a document you can read yourself.

A proposed $100 billion philanthropic fund. An offshore arm “especially for vaccines.” Correspondence about “designer babies” and a human-cloning company.

In the records examined in this book, Epstein appears as a participant in the planning: proposing structures, connecting people, discussing money, and helping advance projects.

The shocking question is how much these powerful people wanted him to make possible.

Today in Washington, I announced Shadow Empire: The Epstein Files.

Its central argument is that Epstein occupied a coordinating role across worlds we usually examine separately: banking, philanthropy, science, and state power. Understanding that role changes the questions we ask about his life—and about what survived his death.

This book follows the proposals, correspondence, financial arrangements, and introductions documented in the federal record, assembling a narrative you can check against its sources. It also argues that the true centers of power are no longer nation-states but networks like Epstein’s, many of which continue to operate with impunity in the shadows.

Who needed him? What did they need him for? And which relationships and arrangements continued after he was gone?

Those questions are why you should read Shadow Empire.

Nearly 3.5 million pages can make a record public while leaving its meaning buried. Across thirty-four chapters, I trace the connections, and lay bare what the record itself seeks to show, and give you the documents to judge them yourself.

The names draw attention. Understanding how they worked together is where the investigation begins.

Let there be light.

PREORDER SHADOW EMPIRE →

Amazon

Barnes & Noble

Shadow Empire Website

Share

Please share this announcement with others.

Please share the launch post on X.

Watch it yourself. This is the complete, unedited press call, published by Protect Our Care on August 19, 2…

Read more

We were talking about longevity itself.

Not longevity in the increasingly commercial sense of adding another molecule to a stack or chasing one more pathway, but something much older and more fundamental: what allows a living system to remain resilient, organized, adaptive, and capable of renewal over time?

I have spent close to twenty five years asking versions of that question. Long before GreenMedInfo existed, I was already investigating the difference between nutrients that come from living foods and their synthetic imitations. Over time, that inquiry expanded into soil, fermentation, the microbiome, mushrooms, light, mitochondrial biology, epigenetics, and the extraordinary intelligence embedded within nature.

The discussion above brought many of those threads together in a way I did not fully expect. And at the center of it was something very small: a plant cell that has not yet decided what it will become.

Food Is More Than Chemistry

One of the most important distinctions Joel and I discussed is also one of the simplest. A vitamin occurring naturally in food is not merely an isolated molecule. It exists within a complex of enzymes, coenzymes, minerals, peptides, flavonoids, pigments, and countless other constituents that developed together inside a living organism. That biological context matters.

This is why I have said for years that food is information. The source of a nutrient, how it was grown, the soil it came from, the organisms surrounding its roots, and even the conditions the plant experienced while growing are part of its biological story.

Fermentation adds another layer. Joel described it during the livestream as a kind of predigestion, transforming nutrients into forms the body can more readily recognize and use.

That philosophy became foundational to the Regenerate Men’s and Women’s Multivitamins. Both formulas are built around whole food nutrition, fermented vitamins, Peptide Powered Minerals™, functional mushrooms, botanicals, adaptogens, and regenerative ingredients rather than simply assembling a list of isolated compounds.

But the farm is not just a sourcing story. It may be one of the most important parts of the formula.

When the Soil Regenerates, Everything Changes

Joel and I had just returned from Heal the Planet Farm in Tennessee when we recorded this conversation. Years ago, much of that land was depleted. Today it is green, biologically diverse, and filled with healthy plants and animals.

The dominant agricultural model often treats soil as little more than a substrate into which inputs are added. Regenerative agriculture begins with a very different premise: the soil is alive.

Animals, microbes, fungi, roots, water, minerals, and plants participate in a continuous exchange. The health of one changes the health of the others.

During the livestream I described these multivitamins, in a sense, as a concentration of that entire living system. Each batch supports regenerative, organic, and biodynamic agriculture rather than being disconnected from the biological source that produced its ingredients.

This is also why I have never believed that healing ourselves and healing the planet are separate projects. Our bodies are extensions of the ecosystems that feed us. What happens to the soil eventually happens to us.

The Longevity Principle Inside BIOSTEM

If you have my book Regenerate, you have already seen the clue.

The Romanesco cauliflower on the cover reflects one of nature’s great organizing patterns, but what fascinated me just as much was what occurs at the plant’s growing tip. There we find meristematic cells, young undifferentiated plant cells that retain the capacity to generate new tissues and structures.

They represent one of biology’s most beautiful principles: life retains the ability to begin again.

BIOSTEM Cell Blend™ was inspired by that principle. Young plant tissues from turmeric, pomegranate, holy basil, noni, and other botanicals are brought together with mushroom mycelium, including melanin rich Chaga. During the conversation, Joel described how those young plant tissues are fed into the fungal system so the mushrooms can transform the plant compounds into smaller metabolites and bioactives.

Then comes the part that makes BIOSTEM especially unusual.

The growing organisms are exposed to specific light and sound inputs. The process uses the visible color spectrum and whole tone frequencies during cultivation. In the livestream, we discussed 444 Hz along with other frequencies and the colors of the spectrum.

That can sound unconventional until you remember that fungi and plants continuously respond to their environment. Light wavelength affects fungal development. Joel also referenced published research showing measurable changes in mycelial growth under low frequency sound, while higher frequency environmental noise can inhibit growth and spore formation.

This is what we mean when we talk about Ancient Intelligence.

Not overpowering biology, but working with the intelligence already present within it.

One Foundation, Designed Differently for Men and Women

The Men’s and Women’s formulas share the same foundational architecture, but we made deliberate distinctions between them.

Both are built around whole food vitamins, Peptide Powered Minerals™, mushrooms, adaptogens, and BIOSTEM. The Men’s formula includes KSM 66® Ashwagandha and additional zinc selected around male vitality and hormonal support. The Women’s formula adds Shatavari SRI 81™ and Maitake to create an additional layer oriented toward women’s hormonal balance, resilience, and long term vitality.

What matters to me, though, is that the formulas were not designed as a collection of disconnected ingredients. The body does not work that way. Stress affects sleep. Sleep affects energy. Energy affects hormones. Hormones influence cognition, metabolism, mood, and immune function.

The body is one system. Nutrition should respect that.

Why We Called It Regenerate

Toward the end of the livestream, Joel described the intelligence of the farm as something we tried to carry all the way through the product.

That stayed with me.

When I look at how these formulas came together, it does not feel like a conventional product development process. It feels more like a convergence of ideas I have been following for most of my adult life.

The research, the soil, whole food nutrition, fermentation, the microbiome, fungal intelligence, meristematic cells, light, sound, and the Romanesco on the cover of Regenerate all point back toward the same underlying principle:

Life already knows how to regenerate.

Our job is not to replace that intelligence. It is to support the conditions that allow it to express itself.

If you missed the livestream, I hope you will watch the replay above. Joel and I went much deeper into the formulas, the farming, the science, and why we believe the multivitamin category is ready for an entirely new standard.

🔥LIMITED TIME SPECIAL OFFER ENDING SOON!

25% off 3 bottle Subscribe & Save. Locked in for life!

Subscribers are prioritized as new batches become available, which matters because production is tied to regenerative agricultural supply rather than unlimited industrial manufacturing.

Explore the Men’s Multi

DISCOVER THE REGENERATE MEN’S MULTIVITAMIN

Explore the Women’s Multi

DISCOVER THE REGENERATE WOMEN’S MULTIVITAMIN

This is one of the most meaningful products I have ever had the opportunity to help bring into the world. After nearly twenty five years of writing about regeneration, it is extraordinary to finally be able to place some of those principles into your hands.

To your health and regeneration,

Sayer Ji

† These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

Get more from Sayer Ji in the Substack app

Available for iOS and Android

Get the app

That is how GreenMedInfo began, and it is how I have served this community for nearly twenty years, with over a billion views on our articled, research and content since its inception in 2008.

But even with these impressive stats, writing has its limits.

You can describe living nutrition, and gather tens of thousands of studies supporting the science of natural healing, and still never place the thing itself in someone’s hand. You can write about soil, fermentation, color- and sound-therapies, regenerative mushrooms, immortal stem cells, minerals, and plant intelligence, but eventually you want to see where it all begins. You want to stand in the field, put your hands into the soil, and watch the idea become something real. Something you can actually feel.

That is what you saw in the video above.

The Regenerate Men’s and Women’s Multivitamins contain more than forty food-derived nutrients, including fermented vitamins, peptide-powered minerals, functional mushrooms, botanicals, adaptogens, and superfoods - produced with organic, regeneratively certified and biodynamic ingredients and processes.

But the formula itself is only part of the story.

What matters just as much is where the ingredients came from, how they were grown, and what kind of living system produced them.

Check out our 40-second farm tour below.

Real Nutrition Begins in an Ecosystem

The formulas I developed with my team contain ingredients sourced from Heal the Planet Farm in Tennessee, a Regenerative Organic Certified® farm.

When you visit the farm, you feel the coherence and palpable happiness of the place before anyone explains it to you. The animals are connected to the soil. The soil is connected to the plants. The plants are connected to the people caring for them.

Everything belongs to the same living system. That is what regenerative agriculture looks like when it is more than a phrase on a label.

Modern nutrition tends to treat ingredients as though they appeared from nowhere. A vitamin becomes a chemical name. A mineral becomes a number. The story ends with the Supplement Facts panel - and the statements of weight (how many milligrams of each ingredient) tell you virtually nothing about QUALITY or INTENTION.

But nutrients do not begin on labels. They begin in ecosystems. Most supplements today are actually produced by the chemical industry, and share many of the same ingredients and processes as typical pharmaceutical manufacturing. As the saying goes, you should get your nutrients and vitamins from PLANTS and not a CHEMICAL PLANT. It’s true!

Healthy soil produces stronger and more nourishing plants. Stronger plants create healthier animals and people. The more intact the living system, the more bioenergetic and informational integrity the final food can carry.

A supplement should not ask the earth to become depleted or should draw from petroleum fertilizers and agrochemicals so that we can become nourished. The two should regenerate together, and your body should feel the difference.

The same principle shaped the nutrients inside these formulas. The vitamins are fermented, reflecting the ancient relationship between food and the microbiome. The minerals are paired with peptide-based carriers that help the body recognize and use them - what can best be described as ancient intelligence.

I often describe these peptides as biological or protein chaperones. They act almost like a zip code, helping carry the mineral toward the exact right places where it can inform, nourish, and vivify your physiology.

The Intelligence at the Growing Tip

One of the most remarkable parts of these formulas is something we call BIOSTEM.

At its center are meristematic cells, the undifferentiated cells found at a plant’s growing tip. They have not yet become a leaf, flower, root, or stem. They still hold possibility.

A tiny collection of these cells can contain the potential to generate an entire plant. They are life’s capacity to begin again.

This is the same principle represented by the Romanesco cauliflower on the cover of my book, Regenerate. Its spiraling geometry is not merely beautiful. It reveals the generative intelligence through which living form continues unfolding from a single organizing center.

In BIOSTEM, young plant tissues are paired with Chaga mushroom mycelium and cultivated under carefully designed conditions involving light, color, and sound.

That may sound unusual until we remember that living systems are constantly receiving information from their environment. Plants respond to light. Cells respond to rhythm. Organisms adapt according to the signals surrounding them.

Light and sound are not decoration in nature. They are inputs. I think of this as nature augmented through intelligent cultivation.

Not artificial intelligence. It’s what we call ancient intelligence.

From Research Into Living Form

For nearly twenty years, I have written thousands of articles, including on the body’s extraordinary capacity to renew itself when it is given the right conditions.

I finally have something I take daily, can give to my family, friends, and loved ones, and my incredible supporters (YOU!), that I feel proud, grateful, and beyond excited to offer the world!

They are a continuation of the research, the book, the Regenerate Masterclass, the farm, and the belief that healing the individual and healing the earth were never two separate projects. They are one and the same thing.

I could explain every ingredient and every sourcing decision here. There will be time for that. And if you have any questions please reach out to our team at support@regeneratecompany.com and they will help get them answered.

Today, I simply want you to see what has taken shape.

I have never been prouder of anything we have made.

Explore the Regenerate Multivitamin Line

Explore The Men's Multivitamin

Explore The Women's Multivitamin

To your health and regeneration,

Sayer Ji

† These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

The Cartesian worldview taught us to think of ourselves as observers standing outside the universe, looking in. It gave us modern science, engineering, and unprecedented technological power. But it also fragmented what earlier civilizations understood as a living relationship between consciousness, geometry, and the cosmos.

In this Notebook LM powered conversation, we explore what it might mean to heal that fracture.

Rather than rejecting science, we ask whether science itself is ready for its next Copernican return: a shift from seeing ourselves as isolated points in space to recognizing that we exist within a continuously unfolding geometric relationship with the universe.

Topics include:

• Why the Cartesian split still shapes modern thought.

• The forgotten geometry hidden beneath our models of reality.

• How astronomy, biology, and consciousness may be more deeply connected than we’ve assumed.

• Why astrology deserves to be tested—not believed or dismissed.

• What a truly empirical “living cosmology” could look like.

This discussion serves as an introduction to many of the ideas now being developed through the Scalar Flower project.

If you’d like to explore the research behind these ideas, these essays provide an excellent place to begin:

→ The Copernican Return
https://scalarflower.com/founders/copernican-return

→ The Maddening Puzzle of Precession
https://scalarflower.com/precession

→ If Not in the Signs—Then Where?
https://scalarflower.com/lunar-nodes

→ The Flower Beyond the Flower of Life
https://scalarflower.com/

Our goal isn’t to replace one worldview with another.

It’s to ask a question that science has always advanced by asking:

What if the map itself needs to change?

In the video above, answers her own challenge without blinking: a spoonful of cold-pressed organic coconut oil. The practice is oil pulling, and as she explains, it is not a wellness trend but one of the oldest entries in the Ayurvedic canon — a daily longevity ritual the classical Indian texts have carried for well over a thousand years. She points to the Charaka Samhita, the foundational compendium of Ayurveda, where the oil-gargling practice known as kavala is praised for keeping the gums and teeth firmly rooted, the breath fresh, and the mouth resistant to disease.

The method she describes is almost defiantly simple. Take a teaspoon or tablespoon of coconut or sesame oil, ideally on an empty stomach. Hold it in your mouth and let it begin to emulsify with your saliva, then push and pull it through your teeth — the pulling that gives the practice its name — for anywhere from three minutes to fifteen or twenty. Spit, rinse, and your mouth simply feels different. No prescription, no chemistry set, no antiseptic rinse with a warning label. As Dr. Kansara puts it, this is the one practice nobody has an excuse to skip — and she sets it deliberately against the trade-offs that come with conventional mouthwashes like chlorhexidine, a contrast that turns out to sit at the center of the scientific story.

Oil Pulling: The Ancient Mouth Ritual Modern Science Is Catching Up To

Oil pulling has become one of those rare health practices that sits at the crossroads of traditional medicine, kitchen-table self-care, and modern evidence review. GreenMedInfo has covered the topic for years, framing it as a low-cost, non-pharmaceutical practice with implications for oral and possibly systemic health. The newer clinical literature supports part of that case: oil pulling appears to improve gingival health and reduce oral bacterial burden.

When a simple, food-based intervention shows repeated signals of benefit across randomized trials, systematic reviews, and mechanistic discussions, the appropriate response is neither hype nor dismissal. It is synthesis. The literature now suggests that oil pulling deserves a place as an adjunctive oral-health practice, especially for people seeking a gentler alternative to antiseptic mouthwashes or a broader lifestyle approach to lowering inflammatory load.

The traditional practice, in modern terms

Oil pulling is an Ayurvedic practice most commonly associated with swishing sesame or coconut oil in the mouth for 10 to 20 minutes and then spitting it out. GreenMedInfo’s earlier coverage traced the practice to classical Ayurvedic sources and emphasized its historical use for oral hygiene as well as broader wellness claims. In the modern clinical literature, however, the core research question is narrower and more tractable: whether regular swishing with edible oil improves measurable oral-health outcomes such as plaque scores, gingival inflammation, halitosis, and bacterial counts.

The strongest evidence concerns short-term effects on oral health parameters. Claims that oil pulling can directly treat non-oral diseases remain sparsely studied and are better understood through the known relationship between oral inflammation and systemic inflammatory burden than through direct, RCT-determined standards of proof.

What randomized trials have found

The early controlled studies, many of them conducted in India, focused heavily on sesame oil and looked at gingivitis, plaque, halitosis, and Streptococcus mutans counts in children, adolescents, and young adults. Those studies generally reported reductions in plaque-related gingival inflammation and oral bacterial measures after one to several weeks of daily use. GreenMedInfo’s therapeutic-action page also aggregates these early findings, including studies suggesting improvements in halitosis and reductions in Streptococcus mutans in children.

Later studies broadened the intervention base to include coconut oil and more formal crossover designs. A randomized crossover trial comparing coconut and sesame oil found similar plaque-regrowth inhibition and similar staining profiles between the two oils over four days, suggesting that sesame may not be uniquely effective among commonly used edible oils. Separate reviews focused on coconut oil concluded that the available studies suggest benefits for dental hygiene and gingival outcomes, while still emphasizing that the evidence base is small and methodologically inconsistent.

Across the randomized literature, the most consistent benefit is improvement in gingival indices rather than dramatic plaque suppression; although some anecdotal (N-of-1) responses have been extraordinary (see Earth Clinic testimonials). In practical terms, that means oil pulling seems to help with the inflammatory side of early gum disease, even if it is not the strongest available intervention for reducing plaque mass itself.

What the systematic reviews and meta-analyses add

The most useful way to interpret oil pulling is not by any single small trial but by the cumulative reviews. A 2016 systematic review of randomized trials concluded that the limited evidence suggested beneficial effects on oro-dental hygiene over the short periods studied, while stressing that the small number of trials and their methodological weaknesses prevented strong conclusions.

The evidence base became more mature with later syntheses. A 2022 meta-analysis reported that oil pulling reduced total oral bacterial counts and improved plaque and gingival scores overall, particularly relative to weaker comparators than chlorhexidine. The most comprehensive review identified 25 trials involving 1,184 participants and concluded that oil pulling probably improves gingival health. The review found chlorhexidine remains more effective for reducing plaque, with the caveat that the downsides of chemical-based modalities, e.g. disruption of the beneficial flora and toxicity concerns, are rarely measured or considered when relative efficacy is measured.

A growing body of clinical research illustrates exactly this blind spot. By suppressing the nitrate-reducing oral bacteria that drive the enterosalivary nitrate–nitrite–nitric oxide pathway, chlorhexidine has been shown to cut oral nitrate reduction by as much as 90 percent, lower circulating nitrite, and raise both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in healthy volunteers — a systemic cost that no plaque-score comparison is designed to capture.

That combination of findings is the clearest current synthesis. There is a real effect, especially for gingival inflammation and oral microbial load, but until more comprehensive comparisons are made, including measuring the subacute adverse effects of chemical interventions, we don’t have all the answers yet from the conventional scientific standard of validation.

Plaque, gingivitis, halitosis, and bacteria

The literature supports four main benefit categories, though not all with the same level of confidence. First, gingival health shows the most reproducible improvement across reviews and trials, especially when oil pulling is compared with water, no rinse, or routine care alone. Second, plaque scores often improve, though chlorhexidine generally produces larger reductions — an edge tempered by the fact that chlorhexidine mouthwash accumulates the carcinogenic byproduct p-chloroaniline, on the basis of which the FDA recommends against using it for more than six months.

Third, bacterial outcomes are favorable but unevenly measured. Several studies and reviews report reductions in total oral bacterial counts and in Streptococcus mutans, the organism often linked to caries risk, especially in pediatric studies using sesame oil. Fourth, halitosis (chronic bad breath) may improve, with early comparisons suggesting effects that can approach those of chlorhexidine in small samples, though this part of the literature is thinner than the gingivitis literature.

A reasonable evidence hierarchy therefore looks like this: strongest support for gingival improvement, moderate support for reductions in oral bacterial burden, weaker but still suggestive support for plaque reduction, and preliminary support for halitosis improvement. None of these outcomes justify portraying oil pulling as a miracle intervention, but together they do justify treating it as a biologically active oral-care practice with meaningful upside and low-to-zero apparent risk.

Why it may work

The mechanistic literature is not as robust as the clinical outcome literature, but it offers plausible explanations. GreenMedInfo has highlighted the idea that vigorous swishing creates an emulsion, increasing the contact surface area of the oil and allowing it to trap microbial debris and lipid-soluble components from the oral cavity. That framework fits with the broader concept of sustained mechanical disruption of biofilm, increased salivary mixing, and physical removal of material when the oil is expelled.

Some authors also propose that fatty acids and antioxidant compounds in oils such as coconut and sesame — especially the unrefined, raw, and organically produced forms — may exert antimicrobial effects or alter bacterial adhesion. Those mechanisms are plausible, but the clinical literature does not yet isolate them cleanly enough to say that any single biochemical pathway explains the observed benefits. At present, the most defensible interpretation is that oil pulling combines mechanical biofilm disruption with some degree of biochemical interaction in the oral environment.

How to use oil pulling, based on the evidence

The literature supports a conservative, practical protocol. Most trials used sesame or coconut oil once daily for 7 to 45 days, usually with swishing times around 10 to 20 minutes.

• Use about 1 tablespoon of sesame or coconut oil; smaller amounts are reasonable for beginners.

• Swish gently for about 10 to 20 minutes rather than aggressively.

• Spit it out rather than swallow it, then rinse and perform regular brushing and flossing.

• Treat it as an adjunct to, not a replacement for, routine oral hygiene and professional dental care.

For people choosing between oils, the current data do not show a decisive winner. Sesame oil has the strongest historical and early-trial pedigree, while coconut oil has accumulated enough controlled evidence to support its use as a modern alternative with similar short-term plaque-regrowth effects. Another approach, which Dr. Kansara advocates in the video above, is to add a drop of clove oil and a drop of peppermint oil to a full 8-to-12-ounce container of coconut oil for noticeably better results.

The integrative-health takeaway

Oil pulling does not need exaggerated claims to be compelling. The best current evidence indicates that it can improve gingival health, lower oral bacterial measures, and support plaque control, especially when compared with weaker comparators than chlorhexidine. Its advantages are simplicity, accessibility, cost, and an adverse-effect profile that appears mild in the available short-term literature.

For an audience attuned to root-cause and terrain-based medicine, oil pulling makes the most sense as a daily or near-daily oral-care ritual that complements diet, remineralization strategies, low-tox living, and attention to chronic dental inflammatory burdens.

That sustainability is itself a quiet advantage. Chlorhexidine, by contrast, accumulates the carcinogenic byproduct p-chloroaniline, and the FDA recommends against using it beyond six months — a ceiling that disqualifies it as a long-term daily practice in the first place.

Oil pulling, therefore, belongs in the category of low-risk, high-access supportive practices: not necessarily a stand-alone cure, but a credible tool whose benefits are now supported by enough research to take seriously.

Learn more about Dr. Kansara’s work here: https://substack.com/@drtiakansar

Learn more about Dr. Kansara’s work here: https://substack.com/@drtiakansara and her platform Together We Rise.

Together We Rise

Together We Rise as one humanity

By Dr Tia Kansara

Notes

1. Sayer Ji, “Oil Pulling: Ancient Secret for Optimal Health,” GreenMedInfo, April 24, 2013, https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/oil-pulling-ancient-secret-optimal-health.

2. Peedikayil F. C. et al., “Effect of Oil Pulling in Promoting Oro Dental Hygiene: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials,” Complementary Therapies in Medicine 26 (2016): 47–51, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27261981/.

3. “Efficacy of Sesame-Based Oil Pulling in Plaque Reduction,” PMC, July 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12294441/.

4. “Oil Pulling,” GreenMedInfo Therapeutic Action, accessed June 27, 2026, https://greenmedinfo.com/therapeutic-action/oil-pulling.

5. “The Effect of Oil Pulling in Comparison with Chlorhexidine and Other Mouthwash Interventions in Promoting Oral Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” International Dental Journal, accessed June 27, 2026, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/idh.12725.

6. “Effect of Oil Pulling on Plaque and Gingivitis,” Indian Journal of Applied Research, July 2021, https://www.worldwidejournals.com/indian-journal-of-applied-research-(IJAR)/recent_issues_pdf/2021/July/effect-of-oil-pulling-on-plaque-and-gingivitis_July_2021_7184243470_2800858.pdf.

7. “The Effect of Oil Pulling with Coconut Oil to Improve Dental Hygiene and Oral Health: A Systematic Review,” Heliyon, August 26, 2020, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7475120/.

8. “Efficacy of Oil Pulling Therapy on Supragingival Plaque Growth,” ClinicalTrials.gov, May 21, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03962777.

9. “Oil Pulling Therapy for Oral Health Management,” Nature Index, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.nature.com/nature-index/topics/l4/oil-pulling-therapy-for-oral-health-management.

10. “Comparison of the Plaque Regrowth Inhibition Effects of Oil Pulling Therapy with Sesame Oil or Coconut Oil Using 4-Day Plaque Regrowth Study Model: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial,” International Journal of Dental Hygiene, accessed June 27, 2026, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/idh.12532.

11. “Efficacy of Oil Pulling Therapy with Coconut Oil on Four-Day Plaque Growth and Related Outcomes,” ScienceDirect, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0965229919308799.

12. “Effectiveness of Oil Pulling for Improving Oral Health: A Meta-Analysis,” Healthcare 10, no. 10 (2022), https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9602184/.

13. “Effect of Oil Pulling on Oral Health,” Wiley chapter abstract, accessed June 27, 2026, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119618973.ch10.

14. “Oil Pulling Literature Review,” RDH Magazine, July 22, 2024, https://www.rdhmag.com/patient-care/article/55054714/oil-pulling-literature-review.

15. Asokan S. et al., “Oil Pulling and Importance of Traditional Medicine in Oral Health Maintenance,” International Journal of Health Sciences 11, no. 5 (2017), https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5654187/.

View the thread on X:

Thomas Massie began his concession speech with an apology for being late.

He had to call his opponent to formally concede the race, he explained — and it took a while, because Ed Gallrein was in Tel Aviv.

The room laughed, the way rooms laugh when a man they’ve come to comfort turns out to be the funniest person there. And from that opening line — dry, surgical, technically a concession speech but spiritually something else entirely — Massie proceeded to deliver 27 minutes of arguably the best political speech he has ever given. From a podium he was walking away from. On an election night he lost.

The man has a gift. The question is what he’s going to do with it now.

“Longer Than Vietnam”

Before any thank-yous, before any policy, before any tears, Massie set the table with a historical comparison that left the room no choice but to start laughing and not really stop.

“Welcome to the most expensive congressional primary ever in the 250-year history of this country. It’s not just the most expensive. This thing went on longer than Vietnam. It started nine months ago and they didn’t even have a candidate — they just decided they wanted to take me out.”

Vietnam. He compared his primary to Vietnam. Not hyperbolically — contextually.

The campaign lasted nine months. They had no candidate when they started. They just had a mission: Thomas Massie must go. And so they built a candidate, funded a war chest that swelled to somewhere north of $35 million by his estimate, and ran the most expensive congressional primary in American history — in a rural Kentucky district — to defeat one man they found inconvenient.

He accepted the result, called to concede, and opened with Vietnam.

The Epstein Files: A Two-Page Bill That Toppled a Dynasty

The crowd was already warmed up when Massie arrived at the topic that lit up the room: the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Two pages long. Introduced, passed, signed. And in his telling, a bill that brought down — with remarkable efficiency — the CEO of the World Economic Forum.

“By the way, do you know how many pages the Epstein Files Transparency Act was? Two pages... Guess what happened to Klaus’s CEO? He was in the Epstein files. He had to resign. We took out the CEO of the World Economic Forum with a two-page bill.”

This was the rhetorical pivot of the evening. Massie had spent much of the speech cataloguing what he’d fought for and against — foreign aid, the draft, the WEF’s eat-bugs agenda. But here he landed the punch: they’d all told us you’ll own nothing and be happy. Well — guess what happened to them.

Then he started reading the box score:

“We’ve taken out two dozen CEOs, an ambassador, a prince, a prime minister, a minister of culture — and that was just six months. I’ve got seven months left in Congress.”

He announced this like a man not conceding a race but filing a progress report. The Epstein Files Act’s six-month anniversary, he noted, happened to fall on this exact primary election night.

He seemed to find that timing meaningful. So did the crowd.

MAHA: Does Anybody Want to Eat Poison?

Massie has been making the rounds of the health freedom coalition for years — long before it was politically fashionable, long before Make America Healthy Again had a mascot. He was there when it was just lonely votes. So when he turned to this section of the speech, it hit differently than campaign-trail boilerplate.

“MAHA — is anybody here for MAHA? Does anybody want to eat poison? Do you want the government telling you what to eat? Do you want the government telling you to put a needle in your arm? I don’t either. And that’s why I’ve been fighting all of that stuff. We need food freedom. We need medical freedom. We need all of those freedoms.”

He’d been fighting vaccine mandates, jury trial rights for vaccine injury, and seed oil and food additive exposure — all years before MAHA gave it a brand name. He was pointing out that he arrived at this table early.

He then pivoted to the 7th Amendment — the right to a jury trial — which he noted with some genuine surprise he’d been forced to fight for:

“They’ve taken it away for vaccines. If you get hurt, you can’t sue for vaccines. They’re trying to take it away for pesticides. They’re trying to take it away for data centers. These corporations want get-out-of-court-free cards. We’re not going to give them one.”

The Amish Cartel and the Lactose Lobby

If the Epstein Files section was the night’s signature political moment, what came next was its signature comedic one.

Massie called a toast. He wanted to raise a glass in honor of his late wife. And then — in a moment of genuine tenderness threaded through genuine absurdism — he explained what was in the glass.

“This is the one scandal. This is the one scandal they never figured out on me. I get my milk from the Amish cartel. And I don’t pay for it with Federal Reserve notes. I trade peaches — peaches for dairy.”

The word cartel was exquisite. Technically accurate — it describes a supply-coordinating organization — but freighted with enough DEA energy to make a roomful of Kentucky Republicans howl. The man barters with Amish farmers in a black-market exchange of peaches for raw milk, denominated outside the Federal Reserve system. And he is apparently very proud of this.

He then toasted his wife, who had weathered the raw milk battle with him — watching his Google Alerts explode with bad press from Washington about his legislation, texting him one of the stories with a single observation:

“OMG — I didn’t realize the lactose lobby was so intolerant.”

A perfect, irreplaceable joke. Delivered in the voice of a woman who is no longer alive, at a concession speech, about raw milk legislation.

The room had no choice but to love him.

The Constitutional Lecture Nobody Asked For (But Everybody Needed)

Near the end, Massie went somewhere more serious. He’d been jousting all night — Tel Aviv, Vietnam, Amish cartels, Epstein files — but he closed with something that lands differently when you think about where the country is right now.

“If you always vote with the president, if the legislative branch always votes with the president, we do have a king. If the legislative branch votes whichever way the wind is blowing, then we have mob rule. But if the legislative branch and the representatives and the senators always follow the Constitution — we have a republic.”

This was the thesis under the whole speech.

This was why $35 million and nine months and the most expensive primary in American history was spent to remove one congressman from one rural Kentucky district. He voted his conscience. He voted the Constitution. He voted “No” when others voted “Yes,” and “Yes” when the room said “No.” He was, in his own accounting, a check — the kind that becomes more inconvenient the more power consolidates.

Whether you agree with his votes or not, the argument deserves engagement. He wasn’t wrong about the structure of what had been done to him. The price tag proved it.

“Transpartisan” — And a Diss on Political Science

In a brief tangent that drew one of the bigger laughs of the night, Massie reflected on his unusual position as someone who voted against his own party at least as much as against the other one:

“I’m not even sure I’m bipartisan. Bipartisan means you like both. I might be transpartisan — because I can’t identify with either some days. That’s the great thing about the polls being closed. I can’t run an ad where I claim to be trans. Transpartisan. Thank you very much. I don’t know which cloakroom to go in.”

Then, turning to an audience member who apparently studied political science, he delivered what might be the best throwaway line of the speech:

“Political science, by the way — that’s not a real science. I’m a political science denier.”

Elon Musk and the Impossible Problem

On DOGE, federal spending, and Musk’s brief foray into Washington cost-cutting, Massie offered an assessment that was both sympathetic and devastating:

“Elon Musk found out it was easier to land a rocket backwards. It was easier to get a car to drive itself. It was easier to put internet on Antarctica than it was to cut a hundred dollars of spending in Washington DC.”

He wasn’t mocking Musk. He was making a structural point he’s been making for years: that Washington’s spending machine isn’t a bug, it’s the feature — engineered to be unkillable by design, bipartisan in its bloat, defended by every lobbying interest it has ever spawned.

The point landed harder for being true.

The Closing: “We Won”

Massie closed — after teasing a 2028 run with the non-denial of a man who knows exactly what he’s doing — with a declaration that would have sounded delusional from anyone else:

“I decided before today that we were going to win or lose today and we would win either way... We won. We won because we started a movement. We showed people that if you’re under 50, you want to save this country.”

Then, on whether tonight’s result was God’s plan:

“What happened tonight was God’s will. It couldn’t happen if God didn’t want it to. So our job is to figure out what was the purpose of having the biggest fight ever — why did it converge on one of 435 congressional seats right here in Kentucky? What was God’s purpose? What is He showing us tonight?”

He didn’t answer the question. He left it open, the way a good speaker leaves the audience with the one thing they’ll still be thinking about at 2 a.m.

Then: “I need a medical margarita right now.”

“You know, I don’t drink recreationally. I have medical margaritas. I even have a medical margarita card.”

And with that, one of the strangest, funniest, sharpest concession speeches in recent American political memory was over.

What He Leaves Behind

Thomas Massie is 54 years old, holds an engineering degree from MIT, built his own house off the grid in rural Kentucky, and spent 14 years in Congress without accumulating a single ethics complaint. He voted “No” on things other people were afraid to vote “No” on. He introduced legislation others wouldn’t touch. He got primaried by $35 million because he was inconvenient.

He called the result God’s will and then toasted his late wife with black-market Amish raw milk traded for peaches.

Seven months left. He’s not done.

The lactose lobby remains, apparently, intolerant.

All quotations drawn directly from Massie’s primary night concession speech, Kentucky 4th Congressional District, May 2026.

Learn more about Massie: "Why Rep. Thomas Massie prefers living off the grid"

Share

That progress means improvement.
That what’s newer is somehow better.

But every so often, something surfaces that challenges that entirely…
not by introducing something new—

…but by revealing what was always there.

That’s what emerged in a recent conversation between myself and Jordan Rubin.

It began with a simple—but disarming—idea:

What if we’ve misunderstood one of the most fundamental parts of the plant?

🔥CLICK HERE AND TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS SPECIAL OFFER WHILE SUPPLIES LAST!

The Part We Never Considered

We eat the fruit.

We value the sweetness, the color, the nourishment.

And then…

we discard the rest.

Leaves have long been treated as incidental—background material in the architecture of a plant.

But both ancient traditions and emerging science suggest something very different:

The leaf may be where the real intelligence resides.

Where Ancient Insight Meets Modern Science

For Jordan, the realization began with a line that felt less like metaphor and more like instruction:

“The fruit will be for food… and the leaves for healing.”

For myself, coming from a completely different path—one rooted in scientific literature rather than scripture—the conclusion was strikingly similar.

Years of research into plant compounds, microbiome dynamics, and nutritional biochemistry had already pointed in this direction:

• Leaves are dense in polyphenols and flavonoids

• They help regulate inflammatory pathways

• They interact with the microbiome in meaningful ways

• They support metabolic balance, including blood sugar

In other words—

they don’t just nourish.
They regulate.

The Imbalance of the Modern Diet

If you step back and look at the modern diet, a pattern begins to emerge.

Not necessarily of what’s included—

…but of what’s been quietly left out.

We move between extremes:

• sweet

• salty

  

Flavors engineered for intensity, convenience, and consistency.

And yet, something more subtle… more regulating… has faded into the background.

Not removed intentionally.

Just… forgotten.

In nature, nothing exists in isolation.

The fruit is not separate from the leaf.
The nourishment is not separate from the intelligence that guides it.

But over time, we simplified the equation.

We kept what was easy to enjoy.

And left behind what helped bring it into balance.

A Return to Whole Systems

What makes this conversation particularly compelling isn’t just the idea of consuming leaves—

it’s the context in which they’re grown.

On regenerative farms in Missouri and Tennessee, the approach is radically different from conventional agriculture:

• Ancient, non-hybridized fruit tree species

• Soil restored through animal integration

• No synthetic inputs

• A fully closed-loop ecosystem

Here, the goal isn’t yield.

It’s coherence.

Because when soil, plant, and animal systems are in balance…

what emerges carries a different quality entirely.

🍵Why This Feels Different

When this blend was first shared with a small group, the feedback was… unusual.

Not metrics.
Not claims.

But something far simpler:

LEARN MORE AND TAKE ADVANTAGE OF 20% OFF

“It feels like a cup of hope.”

And maybe that’s the signal.

Not just what something does—

but how it lands.

Healing Leaves

What came out of this seven-year process is a formulation built on a simple premise:

That the leaves of fruit-bearing trees—when grown, harvested, and combined intentionally—can offer something we’ve been missing.

A blend of 12 regenerative leaves, including:

• Mulberry

• Apple

• Fig

• Persimmon

• Muscadine

• Soursop
  …and others

No caffeine.
No additives.
No fragmentation.

Just the leaf—returned to its place.

🔥A Simple Invitation For an Incredible Offer

Right now, there’s a 20% discount available—automatically applied at checkout.

This is EXCLUSIVE for GreenMedInfo. Please share with whomever you feel might benefit from this offer.

No code. No friction. Just an open door. CLICK THE BUTTON BELLOW AND…

TAKE ADVANTAGE WHILE SUPPLIES LAST

There’s a tendency to search far and wide for solutions.

To assume complexity must hold the answer.

But sometimes…

the most profound shifts come from seeing something familiar differently.

“The leaves are for healing.”

Not as poetry.

But as a reminder.

Imagine turning on the news and hearing the President of the United States declare that you are responsible for killing people. Not metaphorically, not rhetorically, but explicitly. That is what happened to a group later labeled the “Disinformation Dozen”—twelve voices publicly accused of driving the majority of COVID “misinformation” online. Their alleged offense was not violence or fraud, but something far more threatening to centralized authority: they asked questions, shared data, and refused to remain silent.

What They Were Actually Doing

When you move beyond the label, a very different picture emerges.

These were doctors, researchers, and educators who were highlighting recovery rates absent from mainstream reporting, questioning the safety profile and long-term data behind novel medical interventions, and pointing to peer-reviewed research that complicated the official narrative. They spoke about informed consent, bodily autonomy, and the fundamental right of individuals to make decisions about their own health.

In essence, they introduced nuance into a moment that demanded absolute compliance.

The Response Was Not Debate—It Was Removal

What followed was not an open exchange of ideas. It was something far more coordinated.

Within hours to days:

• Entire social media platforms vanished

• Years—sometimes decades—of content were wiped without warning

• Payment processors froze or seized funds

• Medical licenses were challenged or revoked

• Media outlets published coordinated smear campaigns

For many, it felt less like criticism—and more like erasure.

“It was like they didn’t just take away your canvas—they shut down the entire museum.”

The Lawsuit That Big Tech Hoped Would Never Come

On May 15, 2025, our legal team filed a landmark 171-page federal civil rights lawsuit in the Middle District of Florida. This isn’t a complaint letter. This isn’t a social media post. This is a full-blown legal offensive naming dozens of defendants — including the CCDH, its CEO Imran Ahmed, senior U.S. government officials, federal agencies, and the tech platforms that carried out the censorship.

The complaint lays out a coordinated, multi-year campaign of constitutional violations, defamation, economic destruction, and unprecedented government-private collusion. We’re talking about databases tracking Americans based on political viewpoints. Systematic digital surveillance of constitutionally protected speech. The U.S. State Department coordinating with foreign governments and media to amplify CCDH’s false claims across jurisdictions.

This wasn’t incidental. It was systemic.

We are demanding accountability: affirmation of our First and Fifth Amendment rights, injunctions to prevent future censorship-by-proxy, and full discovery to uncover just how far this influence network truly extends.

This Is David vs. Goliath — And We’re David

Let’s be honest about what we’re up against.

We’re standing against the multi-trillion-dollar machinery of Big Tech — platforms that censored hundreds of millions of people worldwide. They have limitless resources, armies of lawyers, and the full weight of government and media behind them.

And who’s on the other side? A handful of citizens and a few highly principled attorneys.

Dr. Ben Tapper put it plainly:

“We need all the help we can get. This is for our children’s children’s children. This is for freedom of speech.”

He’s echoing something Thomas Jefferson warned us about long ago — that if we lose freedom of speech, we will be led, deaf and silent, like sheep to the slaughter.

We only have the rights and freedoms we’re willing to defend. This lawsuit is how we defend them.

What We Lost — And What We Stand to Win

This isn’t abstract. Six real Americans — doctors, researchers, authors, and entrepreneurs — lost their businesses, their platforms, their reputations, and in many cases their primary sources of income. All for exercising the most fundamental American right: the freedom to question government health policy.

But here’s the thing — if this case succeeds, it won’t just vindicate six plaintiffs. It will establish a legal firewall that protects every American from government-driven censorship. No matter who’s in office. No matter what the issue. A new administration can issue executive orders, but only the courts can set the kind of precedent that prevents this from ever happening again.

This case can restore constitutional order and re-establish a principle that should never have been in question: the government doesn’t get to silence you just because it disagrees.

We Need You in This Fight

DONATE NOW

Litigation of this magnitude is brutally expensive. Court filings, depositions, subpoenas of government and Big Tech witnesses, expert reports on censorship infrastructure, trial preparation — every phase costs real money. And we’re facing the most well-funded defendants in history.

Our goal is to raise $1 million over the next six months to survive motion practice, withstand discovery battles, and get this case to trial.

Every single dollar goes directly into a designated legal trust account managed by Childers Law, LLC. No plaintiff receives any personal benefit or distribution. This isn’t about us. This is about setting a precedent that protects all of us.

As Dr. Tapper said — pray on it, and if you feel called, give what you can.

👉 Donate Now at GiveSendGo.com/Deliberate-Dozen

Share This. Talk About It. Don’t Let It Die in Silence.

They built a wall to contain us. It’s cracking.

The truth doesn’t need permission. It needs people willing to stand behind it — with their voices, their resources, and their refusal to be afraid.

This is your chance to say: Never again.

Donate. Share this far and wide. And stand up for the freedom they tried to erase.

With clarity, strength, and unshakable purpose,

Sayer Ji

The funds from this campaign will be received by Childers Law, LLC and used for the legal defense of: Dr. Christiane Northrup, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Dr. Ben Tapper, Sayer Ji, Rizza Islam, and Erin Elizabeth Finn. All client funds are held in a designated attorney trust account, in accordance with legal and ethical requirements. These accounts are strictly regulated and are separate from the law firm’s operating funds.

Share Sayer Ji's Substack

When author and researcher Dean Henderson sat down for this conversation, he didn’t hold back. Known for his books on global finance and geopolitics — and for being deplatformed before it became …

Read more

Which makes what I’m about to share even more extraordinary.

Growing up, our home wasn’t naturally oriented. My father trusted allopathic medicine. And as a result, I had a very long and difficult healing journey as a child — because the side effects of medications on his son weren’t something he was looking for. That experience is a big part of why I became who I am today.

So there’s a poetry to what happened next. A full-circle moment I could never have scripted.

During the pandemic, my father and I weren’t close. He wasn’t following my work. He took three Covid vaccines — and he almost died. He suffered serious side effects, and he still carries the consequences in his heart today. What we now understand is that the congestive heart failure he developed wasn’t simply from a fall or a head trauma — that was the surface story. The vaccine injury was the deeper root. And that cardiac damage was also a significant factor in what was driving his insomnia.

Without natural medicine, he would not be here. That is not an overstatement.

That interview covers how we addressed the infection. But recovery is never just one thing. It took prayer. It took family. It took a trainer, exercise, nutrition — Vitamin C for cardiovascular function, and a wide range of targeted approaches to address the root causes, not just the symptoms.

And it took him sleeping again.

That’s where Miso Sleepy came in — and why I want to highlight it specifically as Part 2 of this story.

Because here’s what people miss: the infection and the insomnia weren’t separate problems. They were feeding each other. No sleep means no immune repair. No immune repair means the infection holds on. The cycle is vicious — and breaking it required addressing the root of the sleeplessness, not drugging it away.

Miso Sleepy doesn’t sedate you. It restores you.

What’s Inside — And Why It Matters

• Magnesium-Rich Spirulina

Spirulina is one of the most mineral-dense foods on earth, and its magnesium content is particularly important for recovery. Magnesium relaxes muscles and nerves, nourishes them at the cellular level, and is one of the most common deficiencies in people who can’t sleep. The fact that these minerals are protein-bound — naturally chelated within the spirulina itself — means your body can actually absorb and use them. It’s also one of the best natural sources of B12 on the planet. You genuinely can’t engineer something better than what nature already built.

• KSM-66 Ashwagandha

Not just any ashwagandha, but the most clinically validated form in the world. Here’s what makes adaptogens like ashwagandha so extraordinary: at GreenMedInfo, we’ve documented over 100 distinct pharmacological actions this plant is capable of. Think about that. A single plant. Over 100 mechanisms. Pharmaceuticals typically work through one — and often come with a hundred side effects to match. Ashwagandha, like ginseng, can modulate — it reads what your body needs and responds accordingly. That’s what an adaptogen does.

Explore the full research database: greenmedinfo.com/substance/ashwagandha

• L-Theanine

A green tea extract with real evidence behind cortisol reduction.

Most people can't sleep because their nervous system never gets the signal that it's safe to rest. L-Theanine works at that root — quietly lowering the cortisol that keeps you wired, so your body can do what it already knows how to do.

• Regenerate-Certified Isoflavone-Rich Miso

Fermented whole-food nourishment for the gut-immune axis.

You cannot heal what you cannot absorb. Fermentation pre-digests and unlocks nutrients in ways that raw foods simply can’t — and a gut that is fed and balanced is a gut that can finally signal the brain to stand down, rest, and repair. That’s not a side effect. That’s the point.

✨My father came back. It wasn’t one thing that saved him — it was everything, approached at the root. But sleep was the hinge. And Miso Sleepy was a real part of what made that possible.

LEARN MORE AND PURCHASE

Note: This product is not intended to treat, prevent, or cure any disease. Insomnia, as I understand it, is not a disease — it’s a symptom of imbalance. That’s exactly why adaptogens work where pharmaceuticals don’t.

What would happen if we stopped outsourcing health to broken systems — and started returning to the intelligence of nature?

That question has shaped our work in human health. But there is one area where this conversation has been largely overlooked: our pets.

The animals we love most are now facing many of the same challenges we are — ultra-processed food, toxic environments, chronic inflammation, and a healthcare model that often manages symptoms without addressing root cause.

The difference is that our pets cannot speak for themselves.

That’s why I was honored to sit down with my longtime friend and colleague Jordan Rubin to discuss Cave Pets — a new approach to pet wellness rooted in ancestral nutrition, regenerative farming, and whole-food support.

The Problem with Modern Pet Care

Dogs and cats were not designed to live on ultra-processed pellets for every meal of their lives.

Yet that has become the norm.

Many pets today are living on biologically inappropriate diets while being exposed daily to pesticides, herbicides, poor indoor air quality, synthetic chemicals, and rising levels of stress. When problems appear — digestive issues, skin problems, joint pain, anxiety, fatigue — the usual answer is often another medication, another intervention, another expensive vet visit.

For many families, vet bills now exceed doctor bills.

But what if we supported health before disease takes hold?

Back to Biological Design

Cave Pets was created with one core idea in mind: feed pets according to their ancestral design.

That means focusing on the foods carnivorous animals instinctively seek in nature — especially organ meats.

Each Cave Pets formula is built on a foundation of regenerative organic liver, heart, and kidney — some of the most nutrient-dense foods in the animal kingdom. These organs provide naturally occurring vitamins, minerals, peptides, and compounds that support energy, resilience, histamine balance, mobility, and overall vitality.

And unlike synthetic pet supplements, these are delivered in a form pets naturally love.

They’re called chomps for a reason.

Support for the Real Challenges Pets Face

What impressed me most about Cave Pets is that the line is designed around the actual burdens modern pets are carrying.

🐾 The Multi Glandular + Probiotic formula includes a targeted probiotic intended to support gut health, digestion, detoxification, and resilience in the face of environmental toxicants like glyphosate.

🐾 The Multi Glandular + Turmeric formula supports healthy inflammatory balance, joint mobility, and skin health.

🐾 The Multi Glandular + Hemp formula features organic hemp and ashwagandha to support calm, sleep, mood, and stress balance without sedation.

🐾 And the Liver + Beet Chomps provide daily foundational nourishment using whole-food ingredients pets can actually benefit from.

This is not about masking symptoms.

It is about restoring terrain.

A Better Standard for Pet Wellness

Jordan made an important point during our conversation: the standards allowed in conventional pet food and pet supplements are far lower than most people realize.

Cave Pets takes a very different approach.

These formulas use human-grade superfoods, regenerative ingredients, and ancestrally appropriate nutritional building blocks designed to nourish pets the way nature intended.

That matters.

Because if our pets are truly family, they deserve more than the cheapest standard of care.

They deserve real nourishment.

🚀A Special Launch Offer for the GreenMedInfo Community!

To introduce Cave Pets, Jordan has created a special Ancestral Pet Protocol for the GreenMedInfo community.

⏰For a limited time, you can receive a package valued at $90.80 for just $52.95!

👉THATS OVER 50% OFF!

It includes:

🐕This is an introductory launch offer and will only be available for a short time.

LEARN MORE AND PURCHASE

Your Pet Depends on What You Choose

Our pets cannot read labels, research ingredients, or advocate for a better path.

But we can.

And when we begin to nourish them in alignment with their biology, we give them something every animal deserves: the chance to live with greater strength, vitality, and joy.

Claim the Cave Pets Ancestral Pet Protocol HERE before the launch offer ends.

Most supplements come with bold promises but limited evidence. Creatine is the opposite. Today there are over 5,000 clinical studies exploring its effects, and more than 70,000 references indexed on PubMed. That alone should tell us something important: this is not a fringe compound. It is one of the most studied nutritional molecules in human physiology.

But the real reason creatine matters has nothing to do with hype or gym culture. It comes down to one simple reality of biology: Energy.

The Energy Currency of Life

Every cell in your body runs on a molecule called ATP — adenosine triphosphate. ATP is the fundamental energy currency of life. Every heartbeat, every thought, every muscle contraction depends on it.

The problem is that your body stores very little ATP at any given moment. When you exert yourself physically or mentally, ATP is rapidly spent.

Creatine plays a critical role in helping the body recycle that energy. It allows ATP to be regenerated faster, which means the organs that require the most energy — the brain, the heart, and the muscles — can function more efficiently.

When people take creatine consistently, they often notice improvements in mental clarity, physical endurance, and recovery. It’s not a stimulant. It’s simply supporting the body’s natural energy system.

Why Collagen Matters As We Age

Creatine is only part of the story.

Another essential component of healthy aging is collagen, one of the most abundant structural proteins in the human body. Collagen forms much of the architecture of our connective tissues, joints, skin, blood vessels, and cellular membranes.

Beginning around age thirty, the body’s natural collagen production gradually declines. When that happens, tissues lose some of their resilience and repair capacity.

Combining creatine with collagen creates a powerful biological synergy. One supports the body’s energy systems, while the other supports structural integrity throughout the tissues that depend on it.

Strengthening the Terrain

In many ways, this reflects a principle that has guided much of my work over the years: health is not about chasing symptoms. It’s about strengthening the terrain of the body itself.

When cellular energy improves and structural resilience is supported, the body becomes far more capable of adapting to stress, recovering from exertion, and maintaining vitality as we age.

That’s why I was excited to discover the formulation created by former NFL fullback Heath Evans and his wife Chrissy. Their mission was to create supplements that align with the body’s natural biology rather than the artificial formulas that dominate the sports nutrition industry.

Working alongside nutritional pioneer Jordan Rubin, they developed a formula that combines clean, Regenerative Organic Certified-sourced creatine with multi-type collagen and additional ingredients designed to support digestion and absorption. The goal was not simply performance enhancement, but a foundational approach to energy, strength, and long-term resilience.

More Than a “Gym Supplement”

One of the most interesting developments in recent research is the growing recognition that creatine is not just useful for athletes.

Studies now suggest it may support cognitive function, mitochondrial energy production, and the preservation of muscle mass as we age. Maintaining muscle is increasingly recognized as one of the strongest predictors of longevity and independence later in life.

In other words, this is not simply about lifting weights. It’s about maintaining the biological strength that allows us to stay active, clear-minded, and engaged with the people and purpose in our lives.

✨ A Very Special Offer for the GreenMedInfo Community

For the GreenMedInfo community, Heath and Chrissy have made a special offer available for a limited time.

For the next week, readers can receive:

💪 20% off their innovative Creatine + Collagen formula, designed to support muscle strength, recovery, connective tissue health, and cellular energy.

The formula comes in several options depending on your preferences — including flavored drink mixes, an unflavored version for stacking with other supplements, and convenient capsule forms.

Some versions also include naturally sourced green coffee extract for additional cognitive energy and metabolic support.

👉 Redeem the GreenMedInfo Community Offers Below

Choose the Formula That Fits You

🍓 Creatine + Collagen (Mixed Berry)

A refreshing daily drink mix that combines creatine for cellular energy with collagen for connective tissue support in a delicious mixed berry flavor.

👉 Learn more:
https://viceranutrition.com/products/creatine-x-collagen-mixed-berry?sca_ref=8986306.V3UE9QR2FoZneEY

🍋 Creatine + Collagen + Caffeine (Raspberry Lemonade)

For those who want additional mental clarity and performance energy, this version includes naturally sourced green coffee extract alongside creatine and collagen.

👉 Explore the Raspberry Lemonade formula:
https://viceranutrition.com/products/creatine-x-collagen-x-caffeine-raspberry-lemonade?sca_ref=8986306.V3UE9QR2FoZneEY

⚪ Creatine + Collagen (Unflavored)

Perfect for stacking into smoothies, coffee, or other beverages without altering flavor.

👉 View the unflavored option:
https://viceranutrition.com/products/creatine-x-collagen-unflavored?sca_ref=8986306.V3UE9QR2FoZneEY

💊 Creatine + Collagen + Caffeine Capsules

A convenient capsule form with green coffee extract for added cognitive energy, ideal for travel or those who prefer not to mix powders.

👉 Learn more about the capsules:
https://viceranutrition.com/products/creatine-x-collagen-x-caffeine-capsules?sca_ref=8986306.V3UE9QR2FoZneEY

💊 Creatine + Collagen Capsules

The same powerful formula in a simple capsule format for easy daily support.

👉 Explore the capsule version:
https://viceranutrition.com/products/creatine-x-collagen-capsules?sca_ref=8986306.V3UE9QR2FoZneEY

🍋 Turn It Into a Functional Lemonade

One of the fun and practical ways Heath and Chrissy recommend using the formula is combining it with their clean hydration mixes.

By blending the Creatine + Collagen powder with their hydration formula, you can create a refreshing electrolyte lemonade-style drink that supports:

• hydration
• recovery
• energy production
• connective tissue health

👉 Explore the Hydration Collection:
https://viceranutrition.com/collections/hydration?sca_ref=8986306.V3UE9QR2FoZneEY

It’s a simple way to turn your daily supplement routine into a clean, functional wellness drink.

A Mission Bigger Than Supplements

What makes this partnership even more meaningful is the mission behind the company.

A portion of the proceeds helps support Bethesda Ranch, the nonprofit Heath and Chrissy founded to care for foster and fatherless children.

👉 Learn more about the ranch:

https://bethesdaranch.org

When you support this product, you’re not only supporting your own health — you’re helping extend that support to children who need it most.

At 88 years old, after a traumatic gym accident last August that landed him in the ICU with brain swelling and cardiac arrest, he developed severe leg ulcerations related to type 2 diabetes that looked like flesh-eating disease. Doctors warned he could lose his leg.

After manuka honey stabilized the wound, we applied royal jelly — the same sacred substance that transforms an ordinary worker bee into a queen — and within weeks, his leg was completely healed. No scars (indicating pluripotent stem cell induced reepithelization into nubile type skin). No surgery. No amputation.

In the video above, Dr. Ji also shares his battle with severe insomnia that was so debilitating he contemplated whether life was worth living. After his acupuncturist prescribed traditional Chinese herbal medicine, his insomnia resolved within days, restoring his sleep and his spirit.

Throughout this journey, Dr. Ji also declined a pacemaker after his ICU stay, choosing instead to recover through natural approaches including vitamin C supplementation, consistent physical training, and careful blood sugar management. Today, at 88, he remains remarkably active — doing pull-ups, squats, and continuing to publish philosophical writings on his Substack.

As a pharmaceutical toxicologist turned advocate for natural healing, Dr. Ji closes with a powerful statement: natural medicine, proven over thousands of years of human experience, should be valued as highly as Western medicine — and should replace artificial chemical interventions whenever possible.

This is his story, in his own words.

For Royal Jelly, I use Y.S. Organic Bee Farms. For Manuka — which I believe belongs in everyone’s medicine cabinet — I use Frezzor Manuka Honey, sourced directly from New Zealand’s top apiaries by my friend Noel Turner, with a remarkable super antioxidant blend that includes pine bark extract. Get yours here today.

🔗 RESOURCES & LINKS:

📖 The Sacred Biology of Royal Jelly — My in-depth article on the science behind royal jelly and its ability to activate pluripotent stem cell pathways: https://sayerji.substack.com/p/the-sacred-biology-of-royal-jelly

🔬 Royal Jelly Research Database — Over 230 peer-reviewed abstracts on royal jelly covering 165+ health conditions: https://greenmedinfo.com/substance/royal-jelly

🔬 Manuka Honey Research Database — Over 110 peer-reviewed abstracts on royal jelly covering 80+ health conditions: https://greenmedinfo.com/substance/manuka-honey

🌿 GreenMedInfo Insomnia Research — 70+ natural substances and 36+ therapeutic actions researched for insomnia: https://greenmedinfo.com/disease/insomnia

🧠 Dr. Sungchul Ji’s Substack — My father’s philosophical and scientific writings, including “The Unified Theory of Organized Systems” and explorations at the intersection of physics, consciousness, and biology:

📰 Sayer Ji’s Substack — My investigative journalism, natural health research, and health freedom advocacy:

Sayer Ji's Substack

Welcome to my Substack—a space where I share insights, research, and reflections at the intersection of ancient wisdom and modern science. As the founder of GreenMedInfo.com, you will continue to receive health information to empower you here.

🌍 GreenMedInfo.com — The world’s largest open-access, evidence-based natural health database with 10,000+ health topics and 95,000+ peer-reviewed abstracts. Empower yourself with the research:

https://greenmedinfo.com

📗 Regenerate: Unlocking Your Body’s Radical Resilience through the New Biology — My book exploring how you — not your genes — are in the driver’s seat of your health: https://www.amazon.com/dp/140195973X

📗 The Regenerate Yourself Masterclass — trusted by tens of thousands to reclaim control of their health through the science of regeneration. Your body already knows how to heal. This gives you the framework to let it: https://regenerateproject.com/2023-sales-page/

DISCLAIMER: This video shares a personal experience and is not intended as medical advice. Always consult with a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

But instead of being silenced, they rose stronger — more committed than ever to truth, freedom, and defending every American’s right to speak without fear.

Followed by millions, these doctors, researchers, and advocates have been at the center of one of the most consequ…

Read more

Read more

When Leah and I founded Stand for Health Freedom together, we had a vision: to give everyday Americans a voice in the policies that affect their bodies, their families, and their freedom. What began as a shared conviction has grown into a movement of millions—generating over 8 million direct actions to legislators, shaping policy in all 50 states, and proving that when We the People stand together, our constitutional Republic still works. Watching Leah lead this organization with such integrity, strategic brilliance, and heart has been one of the great privileges of my life.

What struck me immediately about Reclaim Vitality is how clearly and compassionately it delivers what so many people are searching for right now: a practical, confidence-building guide to exiting the conventional medical system and reclaiming trust in the body’s innate intelligence. Where my own work often dives deep into technical and biological detail, Leah’s book distills these truths into an accessible, actionable framework that any parent—or anyone navigating health decisions—can apply.

Leah shares the deeply personal journey that led her into health freedom advocacy, including her family’s experience with medical coercion, foster care challenges, and chronic illness diagnoses that forced them to question prevailing medical narratives. These lived experiences became the foundation not only for Stand for Health Freedom’s national impact, but also for the philosophy woven throughout this book.

PURCHASE BOOK HERE

We explore the core themes of Reclaim Vitality: bodily sovereignty, nervous system regulation, vitalism, and the idea that health is not something to be injected, prescribed, or outsourced—but something to be stewarded. Leah explains how the book dismantles the pillars of conventional medicine, while offering a new worldview rooted in resilience, adaptability, and reverence for the body’s design.

Our discussion also widens to the cultural moment we're living in—a time when millions of families are reassessing where they place their trust, both politically and biologically. We talk about sovereignty, parental rights, faith, and the danger of fear-based public health narratives that disconnect people from their own intuition and authority. This is the very ground we've been cultivating together through Stand for Health Freedom—equipping citizens to engage the legislative process, defend informed consent, and hold their representatives accountable.

Ultimately, Reclaim Vitality is more than a book about health—it’s an invitation to step out of fear, reduce unnecessary interventions, and cultivate confidence in the body’s ability to heal and adapt. It’s the perfect, easy-to-read and understand guide for parents, families, and individuals who are ready to stop outsourcing their health decisions and begin living in alignment with their highest potential.

I’m deeply proud of Leah—not just as a co-founder and colleague, but as a friend whose courage and vision continue to inspire me. This book is an extension of everything we’ve built together, and I believe it will change lives.

~Sayer Ji